Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35203917›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2022

Heart Rate Variability and Pain: A Systematic Review.

Giuseppe Forte, Giovanna Troisi, Mariella Pazzaglia, Vilfredo De Pascalis, Maria Casagrande

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07055373 (The Safety and Feasibility of Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy in Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 115 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
25.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07055373 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Safety and Feasibility of Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy in Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Randomized Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2026 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsWhiplash Associated Disorder (WAD)ArmsTransauricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A reporting checklist for human and animal heart rate variability research.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe ForteDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5223-041X
Giovanna TroisiDepartment of Clinical and Dynamic Psychology and Health Studies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Mariella PazzagliaDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9196-7078
Vilfredo De PascalisDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4594-8877
Maria CasagrandeDepartment of Clinical and Dynamic Psychology and Health Studies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4430-3367
Sapienza University of Rome · ITFondazione Santa Lucia · IT

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health, RF-2018-12365682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveHeart rate variability (HRV) as an index of the autonomic nervous system appears to be related to reactivity to experimental pain stimuli. HRV could better explain the contributions of sympathetic and parasympathetic activity response to nociceptive stimulation. The aim of this study was to systematically review and synthesize the current evidence on HRV in relation to the experience of pain in experimental tasks. Databases and Data Treatment: Studies indexed in the PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, WebOfScience, and Scopus databases were reviewed for eligibility. Studies on the autonomic response (i.e., HRV) to experimentally induced pain in healthy adults were included. Different methods of pain induction were considered (e.g., thermal, pressure, and electrical). Data were synthesized considering the association between HRV and both pain induction and subjective measures of pain.

resultsSeventy-one studies were included. The results underline significant change in both the sympathetic and parasympathetic autonomic nervous systems during the painful stimulation independent of the pain induction method. The autonomic reaction to pain could be affected by several factors, such as sex, age, body mass index, breathing patterns, the intensity of the stimulation, and the affective state. Moreover, an association between the autonomic nervous system and the subjective experience of pain was found. Higher parasympathetic activity was associated with better self-regulation capacities and, accordingly, a higher pain inhibition capacity.

conclusionsHRV appears to be a helpful marker to evaluate nociceptive response in experimentally induced pain. Future studies are also needed in clinical samples to understand better the interindividual changes of autonomic response due to pain stimuli.

Indexed as

autonomic responseheart rate variabilitypain

Identifiers

PMID35203917
PMCPMC8870705
OpenAlexW4210357258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.