Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35203913›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

High-Level Executive Functions: A Possible Role of Sex and Weight Condition in Planning and Decision-Making Performances.

Francesca Favieri, Giuseppe Forte, Mariella Pazzaglia, Eunice Y Chen, Maria Casagrande

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francesca FavieriDipartimento di Psicologia, Università di Rome "Sapienza", Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6696-5855
Giuseppe ForteDipartimento di Psicologia, Università di Rome "Sapienza", Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5223-041X
Mariella PazzagliaDipartimento di Psicologia, Università di Rome "Sapienza", Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9196-7078
Eunice Y ChenDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Weiss Hall 1701 N 13th St, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9288-7133
Maria CasagrandeDipartimento di Psicologia Dinamica, Clinica e Salute, Università di Rome "Sapienza", Via Degli Apuli 1, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4430-3367

Funding

Ministry of Health RF-2018-12365682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence indicates an association between executive functioning and increased weight, with different patterns ascribed to individual differences (sex, age, lifestyles). This study reports on the relationship between high-level executive functions and body weight. Sixty-five young adults participated in the study: 29 participants (14 males, 15 females) in the normal weight range; 36 participants (18 males, 18 females) in the overweight range. The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and Tower of London Task were administered to assess decision making and planning. Planning did not differ in individuals in the normal-weight and overweight groups, and no difference emerged between females and males. However, normal and overweight males and females had different patterns in decision making. On the long-term consequences index of the IGT, females reported lower scores than males. Males in the overweight range had a lower long-term consequences index on the IGT than normal-weight males, while this pattern did not emerge in females. These findings suggest that decision-making responses may differ in the overweight relative to healthy weight condition, with a different expression in males and females. This pattern should be considered in weight loss prevention strategies, possibly adopting different approaches in males and females.

Indexed as

decision makingexecutive functionsgender differencesplanningweight condition

Identifiers

PMID35203913
PMCPMC8869997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.