Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35203736›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Molecular Determinants of Ethionamide Resistance in Clinical Isolates of

Anastasia Ushtanit, Elena Kulagina, Yulia Mikhailova, Marina Makarova, Svetlana Safonova, Danila Zimenkov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Comprehensive Review of Genetic Mechanisms ofInfection and drug resistance · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Effects of mutations in multiple Ethionamide-resistance-associated genes amongFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. MarR-Dependent Transcriptional Regulation ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  8. Perchlozone Resistance in Clinical Isolates ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Transcriptional regulation and drug resistance inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anastasia UshtanitCenter for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7935-4316
Elena KulaginaCenter for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Yulia MikhailovaThe Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Tuberculosis Control, Moscow Government Health Department, 107014 Moscow, Russia.
Marina MakarovaThe Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Tuberculosis Control, Moscow Government Health Department, 107014 Moscow, Russia.
Svetlana SafonovaThe Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Tuberculosis Control, Moscow Government Health Department, 107014 Moscow, Russia.
Danila ZimenkovCenter for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2040-0904
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology · RU

Funding

Russian Foundation for Basic Research 20-015-00463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthionamide and prothionamide are now included in group C of the WHO recommended drugs for the treatment of tuberculosis resistant to rifampicin and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. The clinical relevance of ethionamide and prothionamide has increased with the wide spread of resistant tuberculosis.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 349 clinical isolates obtained between 2016 and 2020. The susceptibility to ethionamide was tested using both the Bactec

resultsThe MIC of ethionamide increases with the total resistance of the isolates in a row from susceptible to XDR strains. A significant part of the isolates have a MIC below the breakpoint: 25%, 36%, and 50% for XDR, pre-XDR, and MDR strains. Sensitivity and specificity of detection of mutations were 96% and 86% using MGIT resistance as a reference.

conclusionsPhenotypic methods for testing ethionamide are imperfectly correlated, and the isolates with MIC of 5 mg/L have the intermediate resistance. A significant proportion of resistant TB cases are susceptible and eligible for ethionamide treatment. Resistance could be explained using only analysis of loci

Indexed as

drug resistanceethionamideisoniazidperchlozonetuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID35203736
PMCPMC8868424
OpenAlexW4206497959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.