Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35203714›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2022

Is Tissue Still the Issue? The Promise of Liquid Biopsy in Uveal Melanoma.

Daniël P de Bruyn, Aaron B Beasley, Robert M Verdijk, Natasha M van Poppelen, Dion Paridaens, Ronald O B de Keizer, Nicole C Naus, Elin S Gray, Annelies de Klein, Erwin Brosens and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Deep learning for early diagnosis of uveal melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Blood-Based Cell-Free DNA in Ophthalmic Oncology.Translational vision science & technology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA as a Liquid Biomarker in Uveal Melanoma.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Detection of metastases using circulating tumour DNA in uveal melanoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniël P de BruynDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4865-4172
Aaron B BeasleyCentre for Precision Health, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia.
Robert M VerdijkThe Rotterdam Eye Hospital, 3011 BH Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1437-214X
Natasha M van PoppelenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6387-9997
Dion ParidaensDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ronald O B de KeizerThe Rotterdam Eye Hospital, 3011 BH Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicole C NausDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Elin S GrayCentre for Precision Health, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8613-3570
Annelies de KleinDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erwin BrosensDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8235-4010
Emine KiliçDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLEdith Cowan University · AULeiden University Medical Center · NLRotterdam Eye Hospital · NL

Funding

bayer ophthalmic research award 2021Dutch Cancer Society 6905Stichting Coolsingel 495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the second most frequent type of melanoma. Therapeutic options for UM favor minimally invasive techniques such as irradiation for vision preservation. As a consequence, no tumor material is obtained. Without available tissue, molecular analyses for gene expression, mutation or copy number analysis cannot be performed. Thus, proper patient stratification is impossible and patients' uncertainty about their prognosis rises. Minimally invasive techniques have been studied for prognostication in UM. Blood-based biomarker analysis has become more common in recent years; however, no clinically standardized protocol exists. This review summarizes insights in biomarker analysis, addressing new insights in circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor DNA, extracellular vesicles, proteomics, and metabolomics. Additionally, medical imaging can play a significant role in staging, surveillance, and prognostication of UM and is addressed in this review. We propose that combining multiple minimally invasive modalities using tumor biomarkers should be the way forward and warrant more attention in the coming years.

Indexed as

CTexosomesnon-invasiveOCTPET/CTsurvivalUS

Identifiers

PMID35203714
PMCPMC8962331
OpenAlexW4213121971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.