Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35203615›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2022

Signal Transduction by VIP and PACAP Receptors.

Ingrid Langer, Jérôme Jeandriens, Alain Couvineau, Swapnil Sanmukh, Dorota Latek

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. PACAP versus CGRP in migraine: From mouse models to clinical translation.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2025
    Review
  9. Adenylyl Cyclases as Therapeutic Targets in Neuroregeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The Healthy and Diseased Retina Seen through Neuron-Glia Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ingrid LangerInstitut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie Humaine et Moléculaire (IRIBHM), Université libre de Bruxelles, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4984-1295
Jérôme JeandriensInstitut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie Humaine et Moléculaire (IRIBHM), Université libre de Bruxelles, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Alain CouvineauUMR 1149 Inserm, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation (CRI), Université de Paris, 75018 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2912-5168
Swapnil SanmukhFaculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6827-7960
Dorota LatekFaculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0429-0637
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Warsaw · PLInserm · FR

Funding

National Science Centre in Poland 2020/39/B/ NZ2/00584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homeostasis of the human immune system is regulated by many cellular components, including two neuropeptides, VIP and PACAP, primary stimuli for three class B G protein-coupled receptors, VPAC1, VPAC2, and PAC1. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) regulate intestinal motility and secretion and influence the functioning of the endocrine and immune systems. Inhibition of VIP and PACAP receptors is an emerging concept for new pharmacotherapies for chronic inflammation and cancer, while activation of their receptors provides neuroprotection. A small number of known active compounds for these receptors still impose limitations on their use in therapeutics. Recent cryo-EM structures of VPAC1 and PAC1 receptors in their agonist-bound active state have provided insights regarding their mechanism of activation. Here, we describe major molecular switches of VPAC1, VPAC2, and PAC1 that may act as triggers for receptor activation and compare them with similar non-covalent interactions changing upon activation that were observed for other GPCRs. Interhelical interactions in VIP and PACAP receptors that are important for agonist binding and/or activation provide a molecular basis for the design of novel selective drugs demonstrating anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, and neuroprotective effects. The impact of genetic variants of VIP, PACAP, and their receptors on signalling mediated by endogenous agonists is also described. This sequence diversity resulting from gene splicing has a significant impact on agonist selectivity and potency as well as on the signalling properties of VIP and PACAP receptors.

Indexed as

class Bgene co-occurrenceG protein-coupled receptorsmicroswitchesneuropeptidesPAC1pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptidereceptor activationsecretin-like GPCRssequence conservationsplice variantssplicingvasoactive intestinal polypeptideVPAC1VPAC2

Identifiers

PMID35203615
PMCPMC8962308
OpenAlexW4211086393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.