Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35203443›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2022

SERS Liquid Biopsy Profiling of Serum for the Diagnosis of Kidney Cancer.

Tudor Moisoiu, Stefania D Iancu, Dan Burghelea, Mihnea P Dragomir, Gheorghita Iacob, Andrei Stefancu, Ramona G Cozan, Oana Antal, Zoltán Bálint, Valentin Muntean and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tudor MoisoiuClinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Clinicilor 2, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Stefania D IancuFaculty of Physics, Babeș-Bolyai University, Kogalniceanu 1, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Dan BurgheleaClinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Clinicilor 2, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Mihnea P DragomirInstitute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Frei Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitépl. 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5550-3516
Gheorghita IacobClinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Clinicilor 2, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Andrei StefancuFaculty of Physics, Babeș-Bolyai University, Kogalniceanu 1, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ramona G CozanFaculty of Physics, Babeș-Bolyai University, Kogalniceanu 1, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Oana AntalClinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Clinicilor 2, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0183-9815
Zoltán BálintFaculty of Physics, Babeș-Bolyai University, Kogalniceanu 1, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8598-2784
Valentin MunteanFaculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Victor Babeș 8, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Radu I BadeaFaculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Victor Babeș 8, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Emilia LicareteFaculty of Biology, Babeș-Bolyai University, Republicii 44, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Nicolae LeopoldBiomed Data Analytics SRL, Virgil Onițiu 17, 400696 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Florin I ElecClinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Clinicilor 2, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Babeș-Bolyai University · ROIuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2019-3268Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation PN-III-P4-ID-PCCF-2016-0112Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2020-1292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal cancer (RC) represents 3% of all cancers, with a 2% annual increase in incidence worldwide, opening the discussion about the need for screening. However, no established screening tool currently exists for RC. To tackle this issue, we assessed surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) profiling of serum as a liquid biopsy strategy to detect renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the most prevalent histologic subtype of RC. Thus, serum samples were collected from 23 patients with RCC and 27 controls (CTRL) presenting with a benign urological pathology such as lithiasis or benign prostatic hypertrophy. SERS profiling of deproteinized serum yielded SERS band spectra attributed mainly to purine metabolites, which exhibited higher intensities in the RCC group, and Raman bands of carotenoids, which exhibited lower intensities in the RCC group. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the SERS spectra showed a tendency for the unsupervised clustering of the two groups. Next, three machine learning algorithms (random forest, kNN, naïve Bayes) were implemented as supervised classification algorithms for achieving discrimination between the RCC and CTRL groups, yielding an AUC of 0.78 for random forest, 0.78 for kNN, and 0.76 for naïve Bayes (average AUC 0.77 ± 0.01). The present study highlights the potential of SERS liquid biopsy as a diagnostic and screening strategy for RCC. Further studies involving large cohorts and other urologic malignancies as controls are needed to validate the proposed SERS approach.

Indexed as

liquid biopsymachine learningRaman spectroscopyrenal cell carcinomaSERS

Identifiers

PMID35203443
PMCPMC8869590
OpenAlexW4214513330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.