ArticleBiomedicines2022
Brain Tumor Classification Using a Combination of Variational Autoencoders and Generative Adversarial Networks.
Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 120 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Deep Learning for Brain Tumour Analysis: A Systematic Review of CNN-Transformer Hybrids in Multimodal Imaging.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2026Review
- A Combinatorial Approach to Synthetic Data Generation for Machine Learning.SN computer science · 2026Article
- Automated thyroid nodule classification in ultrasound imaging using a hybrid vision transformer and Wasserstein GAN with gradient penalty.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparing Handcrafted Radiomics Versus Latent Deep Learning Features of Admission Head CT for Hemorrhagic Stroke Outcome Prediction.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025Article
- Multi-Class Brain Tumor Grades Classification Using a Deep Learning-Based Majority Voting Algorithm and Its Validation Using Explainable-AI.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- AI in Neurology: Everything, Everywhere, all at Once PART 2: Speech, Sentience, Scruples, and Service.Annals of neurology · 2025Review
- A CNN-Transformer Fusion Model for Proactive Detection of Schizophrenia Relapse from EEG Signals.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advanced Deep Learning and Machine Learning Techniques for MRI Brain Tumor Analysis: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The clinical implications and interpretability of computational medical imaging (radiomics) in brain tumors.Insights into imaging · 2025Review
- A novel approach for the detection of brain tumor and its classification via independent component analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Low Back Pain Using Gene Signature-Based Machine Learning Models.Pain and therapy · 2025Article
- A novel approach for the detection of brain tumor and its classification via end-to-end vision transformer - CNN architecture.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- The Neural Frontier of Future Medical Imaging: A Review of Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Detection.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- Synthetic data in generalizable, learning-based neuroimaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Insights and Considerations in Development and Performance Evaluation of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs): What Radiologists Need to Know.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Integrating Convolutional Neural Networks with Attention Mechanisms for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Classification of Brain Tumors.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Advances in the Use of Deep Learning for the Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Image in Neuro-Oncology.Cancers · 2024Review
- A fine-tuned vision transformer based enhanced multi-class brain tumor classification using MRI scan imagery.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Brain tumors are a pernicious cancer with one of the lowest five-year survival rates. Neurologists often use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to diagnose the type of brain tumor. Automated computer-assisted tools can help them speed up the diagnosis process and reduce the burden on the health care systems. Recent advances in deep learning for medical imaging have shown remarkable results, especially in the automatic and instant diagnosis of various cancers. However, we need a large amount of data (images) to train the deep learning models in order to obtain good results. Large public datasets are rare in medicine. This paper proposes a framework based on unsupervised deep generative neural networks to solve this limitation. We combine two generative models in the proposed framework: variational autoencoders (VAEs) and generative adversarial networks (GANs). We swap the encoder-decoder network after initially training it on the training set of available MR images. The output of this swapped network is a noise vector that has information of the image manifold, and the cascaded generative adversarial network samples the input from this informative noise vector instead of random Gaussian noise. The proposed method helps the GAN to avoid mode collapse and generate realistic-looking brain tumor magnetic resonance images. These artificially generated images could solve the limitation of small medical datasets up to a reasonable extent and help the deep learning models perform acceptably. We used the ResNet50 as a classifier, and the artificially generated brain tumor images are used to augment the real and available images during the classifier training. We compared the classification results with several existing studies and state-of-the-art machine learning models. Our proposed methodology noticeably achieved better results. By using brain tumor images generated artificially by our proposed method, the classification average accuracy improved from 72.63% to 96.25%. For the most severe class of brain tumor, glioma, we achieved 0.769, 0.837, 0.833, and 0.80 values for recall, specificity, precision, and F1-score, respectively. The proposed generative model framework could be used to generate medical images in any domain, including PET (positron emission tomography) and MRI scans of various parts of the body, and the results show that it could be a useful clinical tool for medical experts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.