Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35203433›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2022

Brain Tumor Classification Using a Combination of Variational Autoencoders and Generative Adversarial Networks.

Bilal Ahmad, Jun Sun, Qi You, Vasile Palade, Zhongjie Mao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Synthetic data in generalizable, learning-based neuroimaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bilal AhmadSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4484-2771
Jun SunSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China.
Qi YouSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China.
Vasile PaladeCentre for Computational Science and Mathematical Modelling, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6768-8394
Zhongjie MaoSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China.
Jiangnan University · CNCoventry University · GB

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61673194, 61672263, 61672265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumors are a pernicious cancer with one of the lowest five-year survival rates. Neurologists often use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to diagnose the type of brain tumor. Automated computer-assisted tools can help them speed up the diagnosis process and reduce the burden on the health care systems. Recent advances in deep learning for medical imaging have shown remarkable results, especially in the automatic and instant diagnosis of various cancers. However, we need a large amount of data (images) to train the deep learning models in order to obtain good results. Large public datasets are rare in medicine. This paper proposes a framework based on unsupervised deep generative neural networks to solve this limitation. We combine two generative models in the proposed framework: variational autoencoders (VAEs) and generative adversarial networks (GANs). We swap the encoder-decoder network after initially training it on the training set of available MR images. The output of this swapped network is a noise vector that has information of the image manifold, and the cascaded generative adversarial network samples the input from this informative noise vector instead of random Gaussian noise. The proposed method helps the GAN to avoid mode collapse and generate realistic-looking brain tumor magnetic resonance images. These artificially generated images could solve the limitation of small medical datasets up to a reasonable extent and help the deep learning models perform acceptably. We used the ResNet50 as a classifier, and the artificially generated brain tumor images are used to augment the real and available images during the classifier training. We compared the classification results with several existing studies and state-of-the-art machine learning models. Our proposed methodology noticeably achieved better results. By using brain tumor images generated artificially by our proposed method, the classification average accuracy improved from 72.63% to 96.25%. For the most severe class of brain tumor, glioma, we achieved 0.769, 0.837, 0.833, and 0.80 values for recall, specificity, precision, and F1-score, respectively. The proposed generative model framework could be used to generate medical images in any domain, including PET (positron emission tomography) and MRI scans of various parts of the body, and the results show that it could be a useful clinical tool for medical experts.

Indexed as

brain tumor classificationcancer classificationconvolutional neural networksdeep learninggenerative adversarial networksgliomameningiomaMRIPETpituitaryradiolabeled PETvariational autoencoder

Identifiers

PMID35203433
PMCPMC8869455
OpenAlexW4206615250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.