Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35203329›Full record

ReviewCells2022

BAG Family Members as Mitophagy Regulators in Mammals.

Sophie Pattingre, Andrei Turtoi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Anti-Prion Systems in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Journal of neurochemistry · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. BAG3 localizes to mitochondria in cardiac fibroblasts and regulates mitophagy.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Human proteins curing yeast prions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sophie PattingreTumor Microenvironment and Resistance to Treatment Laboratory, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France.
Andrei TurtoiTumor Microenvironment and Resistance to Treatment Laboratory, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3813-6635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The BCL-2-associated athanogene (BAG) family is a multifunctional group of co-chaperones that are evolutionarily conserved from yeast to mammals. In addition to their common BAG domain, these proteins contain, in their sequences, many specific domains/motifs required for their various functions in cellular quality control, such as autophagy, apoptosis, and proteasomal degradation of misfolded proteins. The BAG family includes six members (BAG1 to BAG6). Recent studies reported their roles in autophagy and/or mitophagy through interaction with the autophagic machinery (LC3, Beclin 1, P62) or with the PINK1/Parkin signaling pathway. This review describes the mechanisms underlying BAG family member functions in autophagy and mitophagy and the consequences in physiopathology.

Indexed as

AutophagyMitophagyMolecular ChaperonesAnimalsMammalsMultigene FamilySaccharomyces cerevisiaeMolecular ChaperonesautophagyBAGmitophagyquality control

Identifiers

PMID35203329
PMCPMC8870067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.