Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35203282›Full record

ArticleCells2022

Regulation of Eye Determination and Regionalization in the Spider

Luis Baudouin-Gonzalez, Amber Harper, Alistair P McGregor, Lauren Sumner-Rooney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. DuplicatedBiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Gene and Genome Duplication in Spiders.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Spider Eye Development Editing and Silk Fiber Engineering Using CRISPR-Cas.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Luis Baudouin-GonzalezOxford University Museum of Natural History, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8960-3136
Amber HarperDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK.
Alistair P McGregorDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2908-2420
Lauren Sumner-RooneyMuseum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Biodiversity and Evolution, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Oxford Brookes University · GBMuseum für Naturkunde · DEUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011224/1Leverhulme Trust RPG-2020-237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal visual systems are enormously diverse, but their development appears to be controlled by a set of conserved retinal determination genes (RDGs). Spiders are particular masters of visual system innovation, and offer an excellent opportunity to study the evolution of animal eyes. Several RDGs have been identified in spider eye primordia, but their interactions and regulation remain unclear. From our knowledge of RDG network regulation in

Indexed as

Drosophila ProteinsSpidersAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterEyeGene Expression Regulation, Developmentaldpp protein, DrosophilaDrosophila Proteinseye developmentPax6retinal determination genesspidersWnt

Identifiers

PMID35203282
PMCPMC8870698
OpenAlexW4213047490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.