Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35203203›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Social Disruption Impairs Predatory Threat Assessment in African Elephants.

Graeme Shannon, Line S Cordes, Rob Slotow, Cynthia Moss, Karen McComb

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Knowledge transmission, culture and the consequences of social disruption in wild elephants.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Graeme ShannonSchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5039-4904
Line S CordesSchool of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL59 5AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1411-7413
Rob SlotowSchool of Life Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9469-1508
Cynthia MossAmboseli Trust for Elephants, Nairobi 00509, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-6959-0991
Karen McCombMammal Communication and Cognition Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK.
Bangor University · GBSave the Elephants · KEUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

Leverhulme Trust F/00230/ACNational Geographic Society 7977-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transmission of reliable information between individuals is crucial for group-living animals. This is particularly the case for cognitively advanced mammals with overlapping generations that acquire detailed social and ecological knowledge over long lifetimes. Here, we directly compare the ecological knowledge of elephants from two populations, with radically different developmental histories, to test whether profound social disruption affects their ability to assess predatory threat. Matriarchs (≤50 years of age) and their family groups received playbacks of three lions versus a single lion roaring. The family groups in the natural Amboseli population (Kenya) reliably assessed the greater predatory threat presented by three lions roaring versus one. However, in the socially disrupted Pilanesberg population (South Africa), no fine-scale distinctions were made between the numbers of roaring lions. Our results suggest that the removal of older and more experienced individuals in highly social species, such as elephants, is likely to impact the acquisition of ecological knowledge by younger group members, particularly through the lack of opportunity for social learning and cultural transmission of knowledge. This is likely to be exacerbated by the trauma experienced by juvenile elephants that witnessed the culling of family members and were translocated to new reserves. With increasing levels of anthropogenic disturbance, it is important that conservation practitioners consider the crucial role that population structure and knowledge transfer plays in the functioning and resilience of highly social and long-lived species.

Indexed as

animal cultureanthropogenic disturbanceecological knowledgelionsLoxodonta africanaPanthera leoplayback experimentsocial learningsocial structure

Identifiers

PMID35203203
PMCPMC8868390
OpenAlexW4213194573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.