Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35203186›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Livestock-Carnivore Coexistence: Moving beyond Preventive Killing.

Skarleth Chinchilla, Eric van den Berghe, John Polisar, Constanza Arévalo, Cristian Bonacic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Skarleth ChinchillaDepartment of Ecosystems and Environment, School of Veterinary Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago P.O. Box 782044, Chile.
Eric van den BergheDepartment of Environment and Development, Zamorano Biodiversity Center, Zamorano University, Tegucigalpa P.O. Box 93, Honduras.ORCID 0000-0001-7566-0415
John PolisarDepartment of Environment and Development, Zamorano Biodiversity Center, Zamorano University, Tegucigalpa P.O. Box 93, Honduras.ORCID 0000-0002-6716-4777
Constanza ArévaloDepartment of Ecosystems and Environment, School of Veterinary Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago P.O. Box 782044, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-8127-4414
Cristian BonacicDepartment of Ecosystems and Environment, School of Veterinary Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago P.O. Box 782044, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-2175-076X
Zamorano Pan-American Agricultural School · HNPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Livestock predation is a global problem and constitutes the main source of conflict between large carnivores and human interests. In Latin America, both jaguar and puma are known to prey on livestock, yet studies in Mesoamerica have been scattered and few have been carried out in Honduras. We interviewed ranchers in a biosphere reserve where jaguars and pumas are present. Local indigenous communities reported livestock predation (average annual loss of 7% from 2010-2019), with preventive and retaliatory killing as their main actions against predation by the jaguar and puma. Other sources of cattle loss included diseases and theft. The extensive management system (free grazing) lets cattle access forests where predators are more common. We found that livestock predation is not random, but rather, related to landscape variables and human influence. Sites farther from human influence and closer to forest cover were more susceptible to predation. Jaguar and puma persistence in the biosphere reserve will require measures that facilitate human-carnivore coexistence and comply with Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 2 and 15 (zero hunger and biodiversity conservation). We propose management practices to mitigate livestock predation in the presence of large carnivores based on examples of proven human-carnivore coexistence in Venezuela, Brazil, Paraguay, and Nicaragua, such as improving the spatial arrangement of livestock (maintaining a distance from forest areas) and the incorporation of confinement pens for young calves (at least the first three months of life) and their mothers. If the pens are built close to the property's house and have constant surveillance and/or dogs, the results are likely to be more effective. Deploying these proven tools may help change the current negative perception of ranchers towards large carnivores that is essential to conservation under the aims of SDG 15. We recommend government policies and support aimed to strengthen livestock health to increase productivity and to reduce their vulnerability to predation. Finally, this study represents a baseline to understand the magnitude of the human-carnivore conflict over cattle in one of the largest biosphere reserves in Mesoamerica.

Indexed as

free grazinglivestock predationMiskitusReserva del Hombre y la Biósfera del Río PlátanoSDG 15SDG2

Identifiers

PMID35203186
PMCPMC8868381
OpenAlexW4212827129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.