Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35203162›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

The Effect of Using Organic or Conventional Sires on Genetic Gain in Organic Pigs: A Simulation Study.

Roos Marina Zaalberg, Hanne Marie Nielsen, Anders Christian Sørensen, Thinh T Chu, Just Jensen, Trine Michelle Villumsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roos Marina ZaalbergCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, P.O. Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2609-3458
Hanne Marie NielsenCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, P.O. Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8001-5629
Anders Christian SørensenCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, P.O. Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9431-4083
Thinh T ChuCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, P.O. Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7226-3454
Just JensenCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, P.O. Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3291-8468
Trine Michelle VillumsenCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, P.O. Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.

Funding

Green Growth and Development Programme (GUDP) 34009-17-1297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current organic pig-breeding programs use pigs from conventional breeding populations. However, there are considerable differences between conventional and organic production systems. This simulation study aims to evaluate how the organic pig sector could benefit from having an independent breeding program. Two organic pig-breeding programs were simulated: one used sires from a conventional breeding population (conventional sires), and the other used sires from an organic breeding population (organic sires). For maintaining the breeding population, the conventional population used a conventional breeding goal, whereas the organic population used an organic breeding goal. Four breeding goals were simulated: one conventional breeding goal, and three organic breeding goals. When conventional sires were used, genetic gain in the organic population followed the conventional breeding goal, even when an organic breeding goal was used to select conventional sires. When organic sires were used, genetic gain followed the organic breeding goal. From an economic point of view, using conventional sires for breeding organic pigs is best, but only if there are no genotype-by-environment interactions. However, these results show that from a biological standpoint, using conventional sires biologically adapts organic pigs for a conventional production system.

Indexed as

breeding planeconomic valuegenetic improvementGxEorganic pig production

Identifiers

PMID35203162
PMCPMC8868153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.