Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35203155›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Herd Prevalence Estimation of

Susanne Eisenberg, Mette Krieger, Amely Campe, Ingrid Lorenz, Esra Einax, Karsten Donat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. High Molecular Diversity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Progress in Paratuberculosis Control Programmes for Dairy Herds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  4. Successful Control ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  5. Molecular Diversity ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  6. High-Impact Risk Factors forAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Susanne EisenbergNiedersächsische Tierseuchenkasse, Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts, 30169 Hanover, Germany.
Mette KriegerDepartment of Biometry, Epidemiology and Information Processing, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training for Health at the Human-Animal-Environment Interface, University of Veterinary Medicine, 30559 Hanover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3536-0236
Amely CampeDepartment of Biometry, Epidemiology and Information Processing, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training for Health at the Human-Animal-Environment Interface, University of Veterinary Medicine, 30559 Hanover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9390-759X
Ingrid LorenzBavarian Animal Health Service, 85586 Poing, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0308-0221
Esra EinaxThüringer Tierseuchenkasse, Anstalt des Öffentlichen Rechts, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Karsten DonatThüringer Tierseuchenkasse, Anstalt des Öffentlichen Rechts, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5376-0116

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On-farm environmental sampling is an effective method for herd-level diagnosis of

Indexed as

cattleMAP-control programMAP prevalenceparatuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID35203155
PMCPMC8868392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.