Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35202954›Full record

ReviewESMO open2022

Recommendations for a practical implementation of circulating tumor DNA mutation testing in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

E Heitzer, D van den Broek, M G Denis, P Hofman, M Hubank, F Mouliere, L Paz-Ares, E Schuuring, H Sültmann, G Vainer and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Liquid biopsy in solid tumours: expert opinion paper of the European society of pathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Advances in laboratory medicine · 2025
    Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

E HeitzerInstitute of Human Genetics, Diagnostic and Research Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. Electronic address: ellen.heitzer@medunigraz.at.
D van den BroekAntoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M G DenisDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
P HofmanLaboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, FHU OncoAge, Biobank BB-0033-00025, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
M HubankThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
F MouliereDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
L Paz-AresDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, H12o-CNIO Lung Cancer Unit, Universidad Complutense & CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain.
E SchuuringDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
H SültmannDivision of Cancer Genome Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Center for Lung Disease (DZL) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.
G VainerDepartment of Pathology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
E VerstraatenRoche Diagnostics, Almere, The Netherlands.
L de VisserRoche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.
D CortinovisSC Medical Oncology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) H S Gerardo Monza, Monza, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiquid biopsy (LB) is a rapidly evolving diagnostic tool for precision oncology that has recently found its way into routine practice as an adjunct to tissue biopsy (TB). The concept of LB refers to any tumor-derived material, such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) or circulating tumor cells that are detectable in blood. An LB is not limited to the blood and may include other fluids such as cerebrospinal fluid, pleural effusion, and urine, among others. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe objective of this paper, devised by international experts from various disciplines, is to review current challenges as well as state-of-the-art applications of ctDNA mutation testing in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We consider pragmatic scenarios for the use of ctDNA from blood plasma to identify actionable targets for therapy selection in NSCLCs.

resultsClinical scenarios where ctDNA mutation testing may be implemented in clinical practice include complementary tissue and LB testing to provide the full picture of patients' actual predictive profiles to identify resistance mechanism (i.e. secondary mutations), and ctDNA mutation testing to assist when a patient has a discordant clinical history and is suspected of showing intertumor or intratumor heterogeneity. ctDNA mutation testing may provide interesting insights into possible targets that may have been missed on the TB. Complementary ctDNA LB testing also provides an option if the tumor location is hard to biopsy or if an insufficient sample was taken. These clinical use cases highlight practical scenarios where ctDNA LB may be considered as a complementary tool to TB analysis.

conclusionsProper implementation of ctDNA LB testing in routine clinical practice is envisioned in the near future. As the clinical evidence of utility expands, the use of LB alongside tissue sample analysis may occur in the patient cases detailed here.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCirculating Tumor DNALung NeoplasmsHumansMutationPrecision MedicineCirculating Tumor DNActDNA mutation testingnon-small-cell lung cancerpatient scenarioprecision oncology

Identifiers

PMID35202954
PMCPMC8867049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.