ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2022
In vivo MRI evaluation of anterograde manganese transport along the visual pathway following whole eye transplantation.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Monitoring outcomes of the first human whole eye allotransplant.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Allogeneic whole-eye transplantation: advancements, challenges, and future directions in vision restoration.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Preservation of Murine Whole Eyes With Supplemented UW Cold Storage Solution: Anatomical Considerations.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Whole-eye transplantation: Current challenges and future perspectives.World journal of transplantation · 2024Review
- Improved reconstruction of crossing fibers in the mouse optic pathways with orientation distribution function fingerprinting.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Technical Feasibility of Whole-eye Vascular Composite Allotransplantation: A Systematic Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSince adult mammalian retinal ganglion cells cannot regenerate after injury, we have recently established a whole-eye transplantation (WET) rat model that provides an intact optical system to investigate potential surgical restoration of irreversible vision loss. However, it remains to be elucidated whether physiological axoplasmic transport exists in the transplanted visual pathway. NEW
methodWe developed an in vivo imaging model system to assess WET integration using manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MEMRI) in rats. Since Mn
resultsNo significant intraocular pressure difference was found between native and transplanted eyes, whereas comparable manganese enhancement was observed between native and transplanted intraorbital optic nerves, suggesting the presence of anterograde manganese transport after WET. No enhancement was detected across the coaptation site in the higher visual areas of the recipient brain. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
methodsExisting imaging methods to assess WET focus on either the eye or local optic nerve segments without direct visualization and longitudinal quantification of physiological transport along the transplanted visual pathway, hence the development of in vivo MEMRI.
conclusionOur established imaging platform indicated that essential physiological transport exists in the transplanted optic nerve after WET. As neuroregenerative approaches are being developed to connect the transplanted eye to the recipient's brain, in vivo MEMRI is well-suited to guide strategies for successful WET integration for vision restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.