ArticleThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2022
The first WHO global survey on infection prevention and control in health-care facilities.
Article in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
94 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prevalence, risk factors, and antimicrobial resistance of endemic healthcare-associated infections in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- World Health Organization Multimodal Improvement Strategy for Hand Hygiene: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Developing a core competency framework for infection control link nurses in general hospitals in China: A modified Delphi study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Compliance with Infection Prevention and Control Practices Among Allied Health Sciences Students in Jordan: Predictors and Educational Implications.Journal of community health · 2026Article
- Infection prevention and control measures during the COVID-19 pandemic in sub-Saharan Africa: a multinational cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Infection prevention and control strategies for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in healthcare: a narrative review.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
- Facility-level determinants of infection prevention and control monitoring in Somalia: evidence from the 2024 Harmonized Health Facility Assessment.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Strengthening infection prevention and control in humanitarian settings: lessons and opportunities from Médecins Sans Frontières (2021-2023).BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Observational
- Analyzing infection prevention and control program in Egyptian university hospitals: strengths and areas for improvement.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2026Article
- Assessment of infection prevention and control in public hospitals in the post war Tigray region of Ethiopia using the WHO Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF).Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2026Article
- Preferences for Infection Prevention in Hospital-Acquired Infections.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Minimizing hospital acquired intensive care unit infections: A focus on prevention.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Feasibility of the WHO Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework in long-term care facilities: a pilot study in the Netherlands.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2026Article
- Critical Gaps in Infection Prevention and Control in Somalia: Insights from the 2024 Nationwide Harmonized Health Facility Assessment Data.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Article
- A comparative analysis of infection prevention and control guidelines across Kenya, Tanzania, and Nigeria.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
- Qualitative assessment of the water and sanitation for health facility improvement tool (WASH FIT) implementation in Zimbabwe.Discover public health · 2026Article
- Article
34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWHO core components for infection prevention and control (IPC) are important building blocks for effective IPC programmes. To our knowledge, we did the first WHO global survey to assess implementation of these programmes in health-care facilities.
methodsIn this cross-sectional survey, IPC professionals were invited through global outreach and national coordinated efforts to complete the online WHO IPC assessment framework (IPCAF). The survey was created in English and was then translated into ten languages: Arabic, Chinese, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Russian, Spanish, and Thai. Post-stratification weighting was applied and countries with low response rates were excluded to improve representativeness. Weighted median scores and IQRs as well as weighted proportions (Nw) meeting defined IPCAF minimum requirements were reported. Indicators associated with the IPCAF score were assessed using a generalised estimating equation.
findingsFrom Jan 16 to Dec 31, 2019, 4440 responses were received from 81 countries. The overall weighted IPCAF median score indicated an advanced level of implementation (605, IQR 450·4-705·0), but significantly lower scores were found in low-income (385, 279·7-442·9) and lower-middle-income countries (500·4, 345·0-657·5), and public facilities (515, 385-637·8). Core component 8 (built environment; 90·0, IQR 75·0-100·0) and core component 2 (guidelines; 87·5, 70·0-97·5) scored the highest, and core component 7 (workload, staffing, and bed occupancy; 70·0, 50-90) and core component 3 (education and training; 70 ·0, 50·0-85·0) scored the lowest. Overall, only 15·2% (Nw: 588 of 3873) of facilities met all IPCAF minimum requirements, ranging from 0% (0 of 417) in low-income countries to 25·6% (278 of 1087) in primary facilities, 9% (24 of 268) in secondary facilities, and 19% (18 of 95) in tertiary facilities in high-income countries.
interpretationDespite an overall high IPCAF score globally, important gaps in IPC facility implementation and core components across income levels hinder IPC progress. Increased support for more effective and sustainable IPC programmes is crucial to reduce risks posed by outbreaks to global health security and to ensure patient and health worker safety.
fundingWHO and the Infection Control Programme, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine. TRANSLATIONS: For the French and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.