Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35202395›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Pediatric Chagas disease in the non-endemic area of Madrid: A fifteen-year review (2004-2018).

Luz Yadira Bravo-Gallego, Laura Francisco-González, Álvaro Vázquez-Pérez, Milagros García-López Hortelano, Rogelio López Vélez, Luis Ignacio González-Granado, Mar Santos, Cristina Epalza, Ana Belén Jiménez, María José Cilleruelo and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Chagas Disease in Europe.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Luz Yadira Bravo-GallegoDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4919-5166
Laura Francisco-GonzálezDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8206-0423
Álvaro Vázquez-PérezDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0250-888X
Milagros García-López HortelanoPediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Rogelio López VélezNational Referral Unit Of Tropical Diseases, Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Luis Ignacio González-GranadoPrimary Immunodeficiencies Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital 12 Octubre; Research Institute Hospital 12 octubre (i+12); Complutense University School of Medicine, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6917-8980
Mar SantosPediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina EpalzaPediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Ana Belén JiménezDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
María José CillerueloDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain.
Sara GuillénDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Spain.
Tania FernándezDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital Militar Gomez Ulla, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8294-5184
Iciar OlabarrietaDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital Severo Ochoa, Leganés, Spain.
María Flores-ChavezDepartment of Parasitology, National Microbiology Centre (CNM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2597-3100
José Tomás Ramos AmadorDepartment of Public and Maternal and Child Health of the Complutense University of Madrid. Hospital Clínico San Carlos. Instituto de investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), CIBERINFEC, Madrid, Spain.
María Isabel González-ToméPediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario La Paz · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESHospital Central de la Defensa Gómez Ulla · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitario de Getafe · ESHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESHospital Universitario Severo Ochoa · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChagas disease (CD) has become an emerging global health problem in association with the immigration of individuals from endemic areas (in LatinAmerica) to other countries.Spain is the country in Europe with the highest number of CD cases. Concerning pediatric CD, treatment is not only better tolerated by younger children but also has greater cure possibilities. The aim of this study was to describe clinical and epidemiological aspects of CD in a pediatric population diagnosed of 10 hospitals in the Community of Madrid during the 2004-2018 period, as well as the safety and efficacy of CD treatment on this population. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsA multicenter, retrospective, descriptive study was conducted. The studied population included all identified children under the age of 18 with a diagnosis of CD. Diagnosis was performed with a positive parasitological test (with subsequent confirmation) or confirmed persistence of positive serology beyond 9 months, for children younger than one year-old, and with two different positive serological tests, for children older than one. Fifty-one children were included (59% male; 50.9% born in Spain). All mothers were from Latin America. The median age at diagnosis was 0.7 months for those under one year of age, and 11.08 years for those older than one year-old. Only one case presented a symptomatic course (hydrops faetalis, haemodynamic instability at birth, ascites, anaemia). For 94% treatment was completed. Considering patients who received benznidazole (47), AE were recorded in 48,9%. Among the 32 patients older than one year-old treated with benznidazole, 18 (56.25%) had adverse events whereas in the 15 under one year, 5(33,3%) did. Eigtheen (78.2%) of the patients with benznidazole AE were older than one year-old(median age 11.4 years). Of the patients treated with nifurtimox (9), AE were reported in 3 cases (33,3%). Cure was confirmed in 80% of the children under one year-old vs 4.3% in those older (p<0.001). Loss to follow- up occurred in 35.3% of patients. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCES: Screening programs of CD since birth allow early diagnosis and treatment, with a significantly higher cure rate in children treated before one year of age, with lower incidence of adverse events. The high proportion of patients lost to follow-up in this vulnerable population is of concern.

Indexed as

Chagas DiseaseTrypanosoma cruziChildEmigration and ImmigrationFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNifurtimoxRetrospective StudiesNifurtimox

Identifiers

PMID35202395
PMCPMC8903257
OpenAlexW4213434363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.