Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35202291›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2022

Methodology and Neuromarkers for Cetaceans' Brains.

Simona Sacchini, Pedro Herráez, Manuel Arbelo, Antonio Espinosa de Los Monteros, Eva Sierra, Miguel Rivero, Cristiano Bombardi, Antonio Fernández

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Simona SacchiniVeterinary Histology and Pathology, Veterinary School, Institute of Animal Health, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, c/Transmontaña s/n, 35416 Arucas, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6493-1275
Pedro HerráezVeterinary Histology and Pathology, Veterinary School, Institute of Animal Health, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, c/Transmontaña s/n, 35416 Arucas, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9316-2882
Manuel ArbeloVeterinary Histology and Pathology, Veterinary School, Institute of Animal Health, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, c/Transmontaña s/n, 35416 Arucas, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1623-5010
Antonio Espinosa de Los MonterosVeterinary Histology and Pathology, Veterinary School, Institute of Animal Health, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, c/Transmontaña s/n, 35416 Arucas, Spain.
Eva SierraVeterinary Histology and Pathology, Veterinary School, Institute of Animal Health, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, c/Transmontaña s/n, 35416 Arucas, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3749-8845
Miguel RiveroVeterinary Histology and Pathology, Veterinary School, Institute of Animal Health, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, c/Transmontaña s/n, 35416 Arucas, Spain.
Cristiano BombardiDepartment of Veterinary Medical Science, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, 40064 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5685-1977
Antonio FernándezVeterinary Histology and Pathology, Veterinary School, Institute of Animal Health, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, c/Transmontaña s/n, 35416 Arucas, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5281-0521
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria · ESUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness CGL2015-71498-PMinistry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness PGC2018-101226-B-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cetacean brain sampling may be an arduous task due to the difficulty of collecting and histologically preparing such rare and large specimens. Thus, one of the main challenges of working with cetaceans' brains is to establish a valid methodology for an optimal manipulation and fixation of the brain tissue, which allows the samples to be viable for neuroanatomical and neuropathological studies. With this in view, we validated a methodology in order to preserve the quality of such large brains (neuroanatomy/neuropathology) and at the same time to obtain fresh brain samples for toxicological, virological, and microbiological analysis (neuropathology). A fixation protocol adapted to brains, of equal or even three times the size of human brains, was studied and tested. Finally, we investigated the usefulness of a panel of 20 antibodies (neuromarkers) associated with the normal structure and function of the brain, pathogens, age-related, and/or functional variations. The sampling protocol and some of the 20 neuromarkers have been thought to explore neurodegenerative diseases in these long-lived animals. To conclude, many of the typical measures used to evaluate neuropathological changes do not tell us if meaningful cellular changes have occurred. Having a wide panel of antibodies and histochemical techniques available allows for delving into the specific behavior of the neuronal population of the brain nuclei and to get a "fingerprint" of their real status.

Indexed as

beaked whalescetaceansdolphinsimmunohistochemistrymethodologyneuroanatomyneuromarkersneuropathology

Identifiers

PMID35202291
PMCPMC8879147
OpenAlexW4207073419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.