Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35202260›Full record

ReviewToxics2022

The Effects of E-Cigarette Aerosol on Oral Cavity Cells and Tissues: A Narrative Review.

Paweł Szumilas, Aleksandra Wilk, Kamila Szumilas, Beata Karakiewicz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. E‑Cigarettes Generate Gas Phase Ions.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paweł SzumilasDepartment of Social Medicine and Public Health, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.
Aleksandra WilkDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1542-8371
Kamila SzumilasDepartment of Physiology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5635-1630
Beata KarakiewiczDepartment of Social Medicine and Public Health, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6527-7287
Pomeranian Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A wealth of research has comprehensively documented the harmful effects of traditional cigarette smoking and nicotine on human health. The lower rate of exposure to harmful chemicals and toxic substances offered by alternative electronic smoking devices (e-cigarettes, vaping, etc.) has made these methods of smoking popular, especially among adolescents and young adults, and they are regarded frequently as safer than regular cigarettes. During vaporization of these so-called e-liquids, toxins, carcinogens and various other chemical substances may be released and inhaled by the user. Data on the potential human health effect attendant on exposure to e-vapor are based mainly on animal and in vitro studies. The oral tissues are the first locus of direct interaction with the components of the inhaled vapor. However, the short-term as well as long-term effects of the exposure are not known. The aim of the review is to briefly present data on the effects of the chemical components and toxins of e-cigarette vapor on oral cavity cells and tissues of oral health.

Indexed as

chemical componentse-aerosole-cigarettesmicrobiomeoral cavity tissuessalivatoxins

Identifiers

PMID35202260
PMCPMC8878056
OpenAlexW4210813781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.