Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35202215›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2022

The Usefulness of Peripheral Blood Cell Counts to Distinguish COVID-19 from Dengue during Acute Infection.

Juan Fidel Osuna-Ramos, José Manuel Reyes-Ruiz, Luis Antonio Ochoa-Ramírez, Luis Adrián De Jesús-González, Rosalío Ramos-Payán, Carlos Noe Farfan-Morales, Alejandra Romero-Utrilla, Efrén Rafael Ríos-Burgueño, José Rodríguez-Millán, Rosa María Del Ángel and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Juan Fidel Osuna-RamosDepartment of Infectomics and Molecular Pathogenesis, Center for Research and Advanced Studies (CINVESTAV-IPN), Ciudad de México 07360, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8280-9812
José Manuel Reyes-RuizUnidad Médica de Alta Especialidad, Hospital de Especialidades No. 14, Centro Médico Nacional "Adolfo Ruiz Cortines", Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Veracruz 91897, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2379-8591
Luis Antonio Ochoa-Ramírez"Bernardo J Gastélum", Servicios de Salud de Sinaloa, Hospital General de Culiacán, Culiacán Rosales 80030, Mexico.
Luis Adrián De Jesús-GonzálezDepartment of Infectomics and Molecular Pathogenesis, Center for Research and Advanced Studies (CINVESTAV-IPN), Ciudad de México 07360, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1415-6260
Rosalío Ramos-PayánFacultad de Ciencias Químico-Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Culiacán Rosales 80040, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-7500-7571
Carlos Noe Farfan-MoralesDepartment of Infectomics and Molecular Pathogenesis, Center for Research and Advanced Studies (CINVESTAV-IPN), Ciudad de México 07360, Mexico.
Alejandra Romero-UtrillaDepartamento de Anatomía Patológica, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Culiacán Rosales 80220, Mexico.
Efrén Rafael Ríos-Burgueño"Bernardo J Gastélum", Servicios de Salud de Sinaloa, Hospital General de Culiacán, Culiacán Rosales 80030, Mexico.
José Rodríguez-Millán"Bernardo J Gastélum", Servicios de Salud de Sinaloa, Hospital General de Culiacán, Culiacán Rosales 80030, Mexico.
Rosa María Del ÁngelDepartment of Infectomics and Molecular Pathogenesis, Center for Research and Advanced Studies (CINVESTAV-IPN), Ciudad de México 07360, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-6785-2035
Jesús Salvador Velarde-Félix"Bernardo J Gastélum", Servicios de Salud de Sinaloa, Hospital General de Culiacán, Culiacán Rosales 80030, Mexico.
Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional · MXUniversidad Autónoma de Sinaloa · MXMexican Social Security Institute · MXPediatric Hospital of Sinaloa · MXAutonomous University of Durango · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 and dengue disease are challenging to tell apart because they have similarities in clinical and laboratory features during the acute phase of infection, leading to misdiagnosis and delayed treatment. The present study evaluated peripheral blood cell count accuracy to distinguish COVID-19 non-critical patients from non-severe dengue cases between the second and eleventh day after symptom onset. A total of 288 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 (n = 105) or dengue virus (n = 183) were included in this study. Neutrophil, platelet, and lymphocyte counts were used to calculate the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and the neutrophil-lymphocyte*platelet ratio (NLPR). The logistic regression and ROC curves analysis revealed that neutrophil and platelet counts, NLR, LPR, and NLPR were higher in COVID-19 than dengue. The multivariate predictive model showed that the neutrophils, platelets, and NLPR were independently associated with COVID-19 with a good fit predictive value (

Indexed as

COVID-19dengueneutrophil–lymphocyte ratioperipheral blood cells count neutrophilspredictors

Identifiers

PMID35202215
PMCPMC8879929
OpenAlexW4210433548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.