Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35202204›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2022

Anatomy-Aware Inference of the 3D Standing Spine Posture from 2D Radiographs.

Amirhossein Bayat, Danielle F Pace, Anjany Sekuboyina, Christian Payer, Darko Stern, Martin Urschler, Jan S Kirschke, Bjoern H Menze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amirhossein BayatDepartment of Computer Science, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1129-9725
Danielle F PaceComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Anjany SekuboyinaDepartment of Computer Science, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany.
Christian PayerInstitute of Computer Graphics and Vision, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Darko SternInstitute of Computer Graphics and Vision, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Martin UrschlerSchool of Computer Science, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5792-3971
Jan S KirschkeDepartment of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rech der Isar, 81675 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7557-0003
Bjoern H MenzeDepartment of Computer Science, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany.

Funding

Training and DisseminationP41EB015902 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KIKINIS, RON, WESTIN, CARL-FREDRIK · 2012 to 2022
$20.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important factor for the development of spinal degeneration, pain and the outcome of spinal surgery is known to be the balance of the spine. It must be analyzed in an upright, standing position to ensure physiological loading conditions and visualize load-dependent deformations. Despite the complex 3D shape of the spine, this analysis is currently performed using 2D radiographs, as all frequently used 3D imaging techniques require the patient to be scanned in a prone position. To overcome this limitation, we propose a deep neural network to reconstruct the 3D spinal pose in an upright standing position, loaded naturally. Specifically, we propose a novel neural network architecture, which takes orthogonal 2D radiographs and infers the spine's 3D posture using vertebral shape priors. In this work, we define vertebral shape priors using an atlas and a spine shape prior, incorporating both into our proposed network architecture. We validate our architecture on digitally reconstructed radiographs, achieving a 3D reconstruction Dice of 0.95, indicating an almost perfect 2D-to-3D domain translation. Validating the reconstruction accuracy of a 3D standing spine on real data is infeasible due to the lack of a valid ground truth. Hence, we design a novel experiment for this purpose, using an orientation invariant distance metric, to evaluate our model's ability to synthesize full-3D, upright, and patient-specific spine models. We compare the synthesized spine shapes from clinical upright standing radiographs to the same patient's 3D spinal posture in the prone position from CT.

Indexed as

SpineStanding PositionHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalPostureRadiography3D reconstructionneural networksregistrationshape priorstemplate

Identifiers

PMID35202204
PMCPMC8879677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.