Screening of TNFR1 Binding Peptides from

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Phage Display as a Promising Platform for Peptide Drug Discovery.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
   Review
2. Strategies for Targeting Peptide-Modified Exosomes and Their Applications in the Lungs.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024
   Review
3. Phage-based peptides for pancreatic cancer diagnosis and treatment: alternative approach.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
   Review
4. The Screening of Therapeutic Peptides for Anti-Inflammation through Phage Display Technology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as