Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35202099›Full record

ReviewToxins2022

Khat, a Cultural Chewing Drug: A Toxicokinetic and Toxicodynamic Summary.

Bárbara Silva, Jorge Soares, Carolina Rocha-Pereira, Přemysl Mladěnka, Fernando Remião, On Behalf Of The Oemonom Researchers

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Khat-associated Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Review with RUCAM Analysis.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hepatitis Associated withJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bárbara SilvaUCIBIO-Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit, REQUINTE, Toxicology Laboratory, Biological Sciences Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7399-0197
Jorge SoaresUCIBIO-Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit, REQUINTE, Toxicology Laboratory, Biological Sciences Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
Carolina Rocha-PereiraUCIBIO-Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit, REQUINTE, Toxicology Laboratory, Biological Sciences Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
Přemysl MladěnkaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6076-6900
Fernando RemiãoUCIBIO-Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit, REQUINTE, Toxicology Laboratory, Biological Sciences Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1382-5119
On Behalf Of The Oemonom Researchers
Universidade do Porto · PTCharles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Khat (

Indexed as

CathaHumansMasticationPlant LeavesToxicokineticsamphetamine-likecathinecathinonekineticsnorpseudoephedrinetoxicology

Identifiers

PMID35202099
PMCPMC8875844
OpenAlexW4205776339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.