Observational studyOcular immunology and inflammation2023
Clinical Outcomes in Vitrectomized versus Non-vitrectomized Eyes in Patients with Primary Vitreoretinal Lymphoma.
Observational study in Ocular immunology and inflammation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma: diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis-a review of current knowledge and future directions.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2025Review
- Incidence, Prevalence, and Ocular Comorbidities of Primary Vitreoretinal Lymphoma in the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network.Journal of current ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo evaluate if there is a difference in the clinical course of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) in vitrectomized versus non-vitrectomized eyes.
methodsObservational multicenter retrospective case series of patients diagnosed with PVRL between 2007 and 2019, at three tertiary centers. The main outcomes were relapse rates, inflammatory parameters, and best-corrected visual acuities (BCVA). Statistical methods used were an adjusted generalized estimating equation model, and a proportional Cox model.
resultsEighty patients (150 eyes) were followed for a median of 1.7 years. At presentation, there were no clinical differences between the groups. The relapse rate was 0.091/eye-year (EY) for vitrectomized eyes and 0.087/EY for non-vitrectomized eyes (p = .35). Vitrectomized eyes had better BCVA than non-vitrectomized eyes (p < .001).
conclusionsVitrectomy had no effect on the relapse rate in eyes with PVRL. However, the decrease in vitreous cell and debris led to vitrectomized eyes having better visual acuity than non-vitrectomized eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.