Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35201942›Full record

Observational studyHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

Safety profile of MenB-FHBp vaccine among adolescents: data from surveillance of Adverse Events Following Immunization in Puglia (Italy), 2018-2020.

Pasquale Stefanizzi, Francesco Paolo Bianchi, Andrea Martinelli, Antonio Di Lorenzo, Paola De Petro, Giusi Graziano, Sabrina Lattanzio, Giusy Diella, Paolo Stella, Domenica Ancona and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Escherichia coli in the production of biopharmaceuticals.Biotechnology and applied biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pasquale StefanizziDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3279-0196
Francesco Paolo BianchiDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Andrea MartinelliDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Antonio Di LorenzoDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Paola De PetroDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Giusi GrazianoDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Sabrina LattanzioDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Giusy DiellaDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Paolo StellaRegional Pharmacovigilance Center, Puglia Region, Italy.
Domenica AnconaRegional Pharmacovigilance Center, Puglia Region, Italy.
Silvio TafuriDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MenB-FHBp was licensed in Europe in 2017 from the age of 10. In the "postmarketing life" of a new vaccine, surveillance of Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) is crucial, to better understand the pattern of safety and the effectiveness. This paper describes the MenB-FHBp AEFIs notified in Puglia in 2018-2021, to take a picture of the safety profile of this vaccine in the real life, four years after its introduction in Italy. This is a retrospective observational study. Data were collected from the list of AEFIs notified after MenB-FHBp vaccine administration in Puglia in 2018-2020, and the number of doses of this vaccine administered in the same period. AEFIs were classified according to WHO's algorithm, and causality assessment was carried out for serious AEFIs. From January 2018 to December 2020, in Puglia, 43,061 doses of MenB-FHBp were administered and 42 MenB-FHBp AEFIs (reporting rate: 97.5 per 100,000 doses administered) were reported. Among these, 12 were classified as severe (28.6%; reporting rate 27.9 per 100,000 doses). Overall, the male/female ratio in AEFIs was 1:1. The median age of people who suffered from AEFIs was 12 years (range 11-13). For the 11 serious AEFIs for which the classification was "consistent causal association," the diagnosis was hyperpyrexia (reporting rate 13.9 per 100,000 doses), fainting (rate 4.6 per 100,000 doses), urticaria (rate 2,3 per 100,000 doses), convulsions (rate 2,3 per 100,000 doses), and vomit (rate 2,3 per 100,000 doses). No deaths or impairment were notified in studied AEFIs. The picture of MenB-FHBp vaccine supports that the risk of AEFIs is in line with previous published data and in general acceptable.

Indexed as

Meningococcal VaccinesNeisseria meningitidis, Serogroup BAdolescentChildFemaleHumansImmunizationItalyMaleVaccinationMeningococcal VaccinesAefiscausality assessmentTrumenbavaccination confidence

Identifiers

PMID35201942
PMCPMC9009947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.