Trial reportBrain and behavior2022
Early onset of efficacy with erenumab for migraine prevention in Japanese patients: Analysis of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.
Trial report in Brain and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03812224 (A Phase 3 Japanese Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Erenumab in Migraine Prevention), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3 Japanese Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Erenumab in Migraine Prevention
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Erenumab versus topiramate: post hoc efficacy analysis from the HER-MES study.The journal of headache and pain · 2022Trial
- Early onset of efficacy with erenumab for migraine prevention in Japanese patients: Analysis of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.Brain and behavior · 2022Trial
- Comparison of Early-onset Efficacy of Anti-calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies for Patients with Migraine in Real-world Clinical Practice: Study Protocol for an Exploratory Clinical Trial.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn two 24-week migraine prevention studies in Japan, erenumab was associated with significantly greater reductions in migraine frequency versus placebo over Weeks 13-24 (primary endpoint). This post hoc analysis evaluated the onset of efficacy within the first 4 weeks after the initiation of erenumab from the 24-week double-blind periods of these studies.
methodsPlacebo-adjusted differences in least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline in weekly migraine days (WMD) were assessed weekly in each study and by migraine type (episodic (EM]/chronic [CM]) (Study 20170609).
resultsA total of 407 patients from Study 20120309 (70 mg: N = 135; 140 mg: N = 136; placebo: N = 136) and 261 patients from Study 20170609 ([EM] 70 mg: N = 78; placebo: N = 81; [CM] 70 mg: N = 52; placebo: N = 50) were included. For Study 20120309, onset of efficacy was observed as early as Week 1 in favor of erenumab versus placebo. Placebo-adjusted differences in LSM (95% confidence interval [CI]) change from baseline in WMD at Week 1 were -0.38 (-0.71 to -0.05; p = .022) and -0.49 (-0.82 to -0.16; p = .004) in favor of erenumab 70 and 140 mg, respectively. For Study 20170609, significant placebo-adjusted differences were observed with erenumab 70 mg at Week 1 in patients with EM (LSM [95% CI]: -0.55 [-0.97 to -0.12; p = .012]), and at Week 2 in patients with CM (LSM [95% CI]: -0.81 [-1.53 to -0.09; p = .028]) and for the overall population (LSM [95% CI]: -0.71 [-1.09 to -0.33; p < .001]).
conclusionsErenumab treatment significantly reduced WMD compared with placebo. Onset of erenumab efficacy occurred as early as Week 1 in patients with migraine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.