Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35201647›Full record

Observational studyJournal of cosmetic dermatology2022

Evaluation of patients with telogen effluvium during the pandemic: May the monocytes be responsible for post COVID-19 telogen effluvium?

Sema Koç Yıldırım, Ece Erbağcı, Neslihan Demirel Öğüt

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sema Koç YıldırımDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Uşak University Training and Research Hospital, Uşak, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0633-1770
Ece ErbağcıDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Uşak University Training and Research Hospital, Uşak, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2887-0492
Neslihan Demirel ÖğütDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Uşak University Training and Research Hospital, Uşak, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5051-5481
Usak University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTelogen effluvium (TE) is one of the causes of non-scarring hair loss that occurred commonly 2-3 months after a triggering factor. It was reported that the incidence of TE increased during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic. However, to date, there is no study evaluating the status of COVID-19 before the onset of hair loss in patients with TE. The aim of this study is to evaluate the patients with TE whether they had COVID-19 or not before the onset of their hair loss and to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters of those with and without a history of COVID-19.

methodWe conducted an observational cohort study of TE patients. The diagnosis of TE depended on anamnesis and physical examination of the patients. Also, hair pull test was performed. Demographic data and the results of COVID-19 real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were recorded from the electronic medical records.

resultsTotally, 181 patients with TE were included in the study. Sixty-four of patients (35.4%) had been diagnosed with COVID-19 before the hair loss started. The median duration of development of hair loss was 2 months (range 1-11 months, IQR 3) after COVID-19 diagnosis. In this group, 87.5% of patients (n = 56) had acute TE and 12.5% of patients (n = 8) had chronic TE. The rate of acute TE and the use of vitamin supplements were ignificantly higher (p < 0.001 and p = 0.027, respectively) and the monocyte count in peripheral blood was lower (p = 0.041) in the group diagnosed with COVID-19. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionIt was stated that monocytes and macrophages infected by SARS-CoV-2 can produce pro-inflammatory cytokines that play a crucial role in the development of COVID-19-related complications. Also, it was suggested that the number of monocytes tends to be lower in the late recovery stage. The lower monocyte count in patients with a history of COVID-19 in our study may be related to evaluating the patients in the late period of recovery and the migration of circulating monocytes to hair follicles. The history of COVID-19 must be questioned in patients with TE. It should be kept in mind that hair loss that develops after COVID-19 may be presented as chronic TE form too. The exact mechanisms of hair loss induced by COVID-19 are not fully explained; the roles of monocytes on the hair follicles may be one of the responsible mechanisms.

Indexed as

Alopecia AreataCOVID-19Cohort StudiesCOVID-19 TestingHumansMonocytesPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19hair lossmonocytespandemictelogen effluvium

Identifiers

PMID35201647
PMCPMC9115203
OpenAlexW4213443021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.