Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35201510›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022

Generalizability and quality control of deep learning-based 2D echocardiography segmentation models in a large clinical dataset.

Xiaoyan Zhang, Alvaro E Ulloa Cerna, Joshua V Stough, Yida Chen, Brendan J Carry, Amro Alsaid, Sushravya Raghunath, David P vanMaanen, Brandon K Fornwalt, Christopher M Haggerty

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaoyan ZhangDepartment of Translational Data Science and Informatics, Geisinger, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA, 17822, USA.
Alvaro E Ulloa CernaDepartment of Translational Data Science and Informatics, Geisinger, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA, 17822, USA.
Joshua V StoughComputer Science, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA, USA.
Yida ChenComputer Science, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA, USA.
Brendan J CarryHeart Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
Amro AlsaidHeart Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
Sushravya RaghunathDepartment of Translational Data Science and Informatics, Geisinger, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA, 17822, USA.
David P vanMaanenDepartment of Translational Data Science and Informatics, Geisinger, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA, 17822, USA.
Brandon K FornwaltDepartment of Translational Data Science and Informatics, Geisinger, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA, 17822, USA.
Christopher M HaggertyDepartment of Translational Data Science and Informatics, Geisinger, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA, 17822, USA. chris.m.haggerty@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of machine learning (ML) for automated annotation of heart structures from echocardiographic videos is an active research area, but understanding of comparative, generalizable performance among models is lacking. This study aimed to (1) assess the generalizability of five state-of-the-art ML-based echocardiography segmentation models within a large Geisinger clinical dataset, and (2) test the hypothesis that a quality control (QC) method based on segmentation uncertainty can further improve segmentation results. Five models were applied to 47,431 echocardiography studies that were independent from any training samples. Chamber volume and mass from model segmentations were compared to clinically-reported values. The median absolute errors (MAE) in left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction exhibited by all five models were comparable to reported inter-observer errors (IOE). MAE for left atrial volume and LV mass were similarly favorable to respective IOE for models trained for those tasks. A single model consistently exhibited the lowest MAE in all five clinically-reported measures. We leveraged the tenfold cross-validation training scheme of this best-performing model to quantify segmentation uncertainty. We observed that removing segmentations with high uncertainty from 14 to 71% studies reduced volume/mass MAE by 6-10%. The addition of convexity filters improved specificity, efficiently removing < 10% studies with large MAE (16-40%). In conclusion, five previously published echocardiography segmentation models generalized to a large, independent clinical dataset-segmenting one or multiple cardiac structures with overall accuracy comparable to manual analyses-with variable performance. Convexity-reinforced uncertainty QC efficiently improved segmentation performance and may further facilitate the translation of such models.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEchocardiographyHeart AtriaHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningPredictive Value of Tests2D echocardiography segmentationConvexityDeep learningGeneralizabilityQuality controlSegmentation uncertainty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.