ArticleDiscover oncology2021
Volume-outcome relationship in rectal cancer surgery.
Article in Discover oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cumulative Surgeon Experience and Anastomotic Leakage After Left-Sided and Segmental Colorectal Resection with Primary Anastomosis: A Seven-Year Single-Center Retrospective Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Short-Term Surgical Outcomes of Curative Colorectal Resections from an Evolving Low-Volume Cancer Center in a Tier-2 City in India.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis after liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis: a systematic review and pooled analysis of oncological outcomes.Discover oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- Trends in the Characteristics, Treatment, and Outcomes of Rectal Adenocarcinoma in the US From 2004 to 2019: A National Cancer Database Analysis.JAMA oncology · 2023Observational
- Application and evaluation of transitory protective stoma in ovarian cancer surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Short and Long-Term Results.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- Timing of additional neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision.Discover oncology · 2022Article
- The effect of anastomotic leak on postoperative pelvic function and quality of life in rectal cancer patients.Discover oncology · 2022Review
- Total neoadjuvant therapy for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic minireview.Biology direct · 2022Review
- Programmed death-ligand 1 and mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway in locally advanced rectal cancer.Discover oncology · 2022Article
- Low anterior resection syndrome: An unavoidable price to pay to preserve the rectum?Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Guest edited collection: current friends and foes in gastrointestinal cancer.Discover oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHospital centralization effect is reported to lower complications and mortality for high risk and complex surgery operations, including colorectal surgery. However, no linear relation between volume and outcome has been demonstrated. Aim of the study was to evaluate the increased surgical volume effect on early outcomes of patient undergoing laparoscopic restorative anterior rectal resection (ARR).
methodsA retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients undergoing ARR with primary anastomosis between November 2016 and December 2020 after centralization of rectal cancer cases in an academic Centre. Short-term outcomes are compared to those of patients operated in the same unit during the previous 10 years before service centralization. The primary outcome was estimated anastomotic leak rate. Mean operative time, need of conversion, postoperative use of blood transfusion, radicality, in-hospital stay, number and type of complications, readmission and reoperation rate, mortality and 1-year and stoma persistence rates were evaluated as secondary outcomes.
results86 patients were operated in the study period and outcomes compared to those of 101 patients operated during the previous ten years. Difference in volume of surgery was significant between the two periods (p 0.019) and the estimated leak rate was significantly lower in the higher volume unit (p 0.047). Mean operative time, need of conversion, postoperative use of blood transfusion and in-hospital stay (p < 0.05) were also significantly reduced in Group A.
conclusionThis study suggests that the shift toward higher volume in rectal cancer surgery is associated to decreased anastomotic leak rate. Potentiation of lower volume surgical units may yield optimal perioperative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.