Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35201453›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2021

Volume-outcome relationship in rectal cancer surgery.

L Siragusa, B Sensi, D Vinci, M Franceschilli, C Pathirannehalage Don, G Bagaglini, V Bellato, M Campanelli, G S Sica

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L SiragusaDepartment of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy. leandros93@hotmail.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9218-1176
B SensiDepartment of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
D VinciDepartment of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
M FranceschilliDepartment of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
C Pathirannehalage DonDepartment of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
G BagagliniDepartment of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
V BellatoDepartment of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
M CampanelliDepartment of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
G S SicaDepartment of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHospital centralization effect is reported to lower complications and mortality for high risk and complex surgery operations, including colorectal surgery. However, no linear relation between volume and outcome has been demonstrated. Aim of the study was to evaluate the increased surgical volume effect on early outcomes of patient undergoing laparoscopic restorative anterior rectal resection (ARR).

methodsA retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients undergoing ARR with primary anastomosis between November 2016 and December 2020 after centralization of rectal cancer cases in an academic Centre. Short-term outcomes are compared to those of patients operated in the same unit during the previous 10 years before service centralization. The primary outcome was estimated anastomotic leak rate. Mean operative time, need of conversion, postoperative use of blood transfusion, radicality, in-hospital stay, number and type of complications, readmission and reoperation rate, mortality and 1-year and stoma persistence rates were evaluated as secondary outcomes.

results86 patients were operated in the study period and outcomes compared to those of 101 patients operated during the previous ten years. Difference in volume of surgery was significant between the two periods (p 0.019) and the estimated leak rate was significantly lower in the higher volume unit (p 0.047). Mean operative time, need of conversion, postoperative use of blood transfusion and in-hospital stay (p < 0.05) were also significantly reduced in Group A.

conclusionThis study suggests that the shift toward higher volume in rectal cancer surgery is associated to decreased anastomotic leak rate. Potentiation of lower volume surgical units may yield optimal perioperative outcomes.

Indexed as

Anastomotic leakRectal cancerVolume/outcome

Identifiers

PMID35201453
PMCPMC8777490
OpenAlexW4206770425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.