ArticleJournal of imaging2022
Head-Mounted Display-Based Augmented Reality for Image-Guided Media Delivery to the Heart: A Preliminary Investigation of Perceptual Accuracy.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 in Medical and Healthcare Context: State of the Art and Future Prospects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Is Overlain Display a Right Choice for AR Navigation? A Qualitative Study of Head-Mounted Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation on Accuracy for Large-Scale Clinical Deployment.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Review
- HMD-EgoPose: head-mounted display-based egocentric marker-less tool and hand pose estimation for augmented surgical guidance.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022Article
- Augmenting Performance: A Systematic Review of Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays in Surgery.Journal of imaging · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
By aligning virtual augmentations with real objects, optical see-through head-mounted display (OST-HMD)-based augmented reality (AR) can enhance user-task performance. Our goal was to compare the perceptual accuracy of several visualization paradigms involving an adjacent monitor, or the Microsoft HoloLens 2 OST-HMD, in a targeted task, as well as to assess the feasibility of displaying imaging-derived virtual models aligned with the injured porcine heart. With 10 participants, we performed a user study to quantify and compare the accuracy, speed, and subjective workload of each paradigm in the completion of a point-and-trace task that simulated surgical targeting. To demonstrate the clinical potential of our system, we assessed its use for the visualization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based anatomical models, aligned with the surgically exposed heart in a motion-arrested open-chest porcine model. Using the HoloLens 2 with alignment of the ground truth target and our display calibration method, users were able to achieve submillimeter accuracy (0.98 mm) and required 1.42 min for calibration in the point-and-trace task. In the porcine study, we observed good spatial agreement between the MRI-models and target surgical site. The use of an OST-HMD led to improved perceptual accuracy and task-completion times in a simulated targeting task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.