Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35200566›Full record

Trial reportCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Clinical Significance of a Dyadic, Web-Based, Psychosocial and Physical Activity Self-Management Program (

Sylvie D Lambert, Lindsay R Duncan, S Nicole Culos-Reed, Laura Hallward, Celestia S Higano, Ekaterina Loban, Anne Katz, Manon De Raad, Janet Ellis, Melissa B Korman and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Exploring the role of psychological flexibility in relationship functioning among couples coping with prostate cancer: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Posttreatment health interventions for adult cancer survivors and their families: an integrated review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sylvie D LambertSt. Mary's Research Centre, Montreal, QC H3T 1M5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9202-9251
Lindsay R DuncanDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada.
S Nicole Culos-ReedHealth and Wellness Lab, Thrive Centre, Faculty of Kinesiology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Laura HallwardDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada.
Celestia S HiganoVancouver Prostate Centre, Prostate Cancer Supportive Care Program, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Ekaterina LobanSt. Mary's Research Centre, Montreal, QC H3T 1M5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3691-1319
Anne KatzCancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada.
Manon De RaadSt. Mary's Research Centre, Montreal, QC H3T 1M5, Canada.
Janet EllisOdette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Melissa B KormanSunnybrook, Research Institute Department of Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5526-2804
Carly SearsUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Cindy IbbersonSt. Mary's Research Centre, Montreal, QC H3T 1M5, Canada.
Lauren WalkerDepartment of Oncology & Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2P 4Z6, Canada.
Eric BelzileSt. Mary's Research Centre, Montreal, QC H3T 1M5, Canada.
Paramita Saha-ChaudhuriDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Helen McTaggart-CowanCanadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.
Stuart PeacockCanadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.

Funding

Prostate Cancer Canada TAG2015-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer is the most common cancer diagnosis among men. Family caregivers (often female spouses) play a key role in ensuring patients' needs are met, frequently assuming their role with no formal training, which can contribute to a high burden. The purpose of this study was to pilot

methods49 men with prostate cancer and their caregivers were randomized to

resultsFeasibility benchmarks were met with the exception for recruitment with on average 6.1 dyads recruited/month (benchmark: 8 dyads/month). Benchmarks of acceptability focused on attrition (<25%) and system usability, which were met. Using the strict criteria for adherence of 100% of the module viewed and participants spending at least 15 min on the module, 45% of participants were adherent. The clinical significance on anxiety and quality of life was supported for caregivers, and mostly supported for the men with prostate cancer.

conclusionThis pilot trial was successful, with minor modifications needed prior to a large trial.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsSelf-ManagementCaregiversCyclic N-OxidesExerciseFeasibility StudiesHumansInternetMalePilot ProjectsQuality of LifeCyclic N-OxidesTEMPObehavior changecaregiversdyadic interventionsdyadse-Health interventionsphysical activitypilot studyprostate cancerpsychosocial needsself-management

Identifiers

PMID35200566
PMCPMC8871005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.