Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35200561›Full record

GuidelineCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

An Evidence-Based Guideline for Surveillance of Patients after Curative Treatment for Colon and Rectal Cancer.

Erin Kennedy, Caroline Zwaal, Tim Asmis, Charles Cho, Jacqueline Galica, Alexandra Ginty, Anand Govindarajan

Open access · goldAbstract readGuideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Watch and Wait Approach for Rectal Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  9. Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Management and Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Erin KennedyMount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave., Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada.
Caroline ZwaalProgram in Evidence-Based Care, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
Tim AsmisOttawa Hospital Cancer Centre, The Hospital General Campus, 501 Smyth Rd., Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Charles ChoSouthlake Regional Cancer Centre, 596 Davis Dr., Newmarket, ON L3Y 2P9, Canada.
Jacqueline GalicaQueen's University Cancer Research Institute, Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University, 92 Barrie Street, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3072-2472
Alexandra GintyDorval Medical FHT, 465 Morden Rd., Oakville, ON L6K 3W6, Canada.
Anand GovindarajanMount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave., Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada.
Mount Sinai Hospital · CAMcMaster University · CAOttawa Hospital · CAQueen's University · CASouthlake Regional Health Center · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide recommendations for a surveillance regimen that leads to the largest overall survival benefit for patients after curative treatment for Stage I-IV colon and rectal cancer.

methodsConsistent with the Program in Evidence-Based Care's standard approach, guideline databases, i.e., MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and PROSPERO, were systematically searched. Then, we drafted recommendations and methodology experts performed an internal review of the resulting draft recommendations, which was followed by an external review by targeted experts and intended users.

resultsFour systematic reviews and two randomized controlled trials were identified that provided evidence for recommendations.

conclusionsFor patients with stage I-III colon cancer, a medical history and physical examination should be performed every six months for three years; computed tomography (CT) of the chest-abdomen-pelvis (CT CAP) should be performed at one and three years, or one CT CAP could be performed at 18 months; the use of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is optional if CT imaging is being performed; and surveillance colonoscopy should be performed one year after the initial surgery. The frequency of subsequent surveillance colonoscopy should be dictated by previous findings, but generally, colonoscopies should be performed every five years if the findings are normal. There was insufficient evidence to support these recommendations for patients with rectal cancer, Stage IV colon cancer, and patients over the age of 75 years. Patients should be informed of current recommendations and the treating physician should discuss the specific risks and benefits of each recommendation with their patients.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsAgedColonoscopyHumansTomography, X-Ray Computedcolorectal cancerfollow-upsurveillancesurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID35200561
PMCPMC8870404
OpenAlexW4210277976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.