Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35200560›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Imaging Spectrum of Intrahepatic Mass-Forming Cholangiocarcinoma and Its Mimickers: How to Differentiate Them Using MRI.

Jelena Djokic Kovač, Aleksandra Janković, Aleksandra Đikić-Rom, Nikica Grubor, Andrija Antić, Vladimir Dugalić

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06342414 (An Exosome-Based Liquid Biopsy for the Differential Diagnosis of Primary Liver Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06342414 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

An Exosome-Based Liquid Biopsy for the Differential Diagnosis of Primary Liver Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorCity of Hope Medical CenterRan2024 to 2028Enrolled400ConditionsHepatocellular Carcinoma, Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, Cholangiocarcinoma, Primary Liver CancerArmsELUCIDATE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jelena Djokic KovačCenter for Radiology and Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Pasterova No. 2, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksandra JankovićCenter for Radiology and Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Pasterova No. 2, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksandra Đikić-RomDepartment of Pathology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Pasterova No.2, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-8949-4873
Nikica GruborFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica No. 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-5419-9340
Andrija AntićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica No. 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Vladimir DugalićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica No. 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
University of Belgrade · RSUniverzitetski Klinički Centar Srbije · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary hepatic malignancy, with mass-forming growth pattern being the most common. The typical imaging appearance of mass-forming ICC (mICC) consists of irregular ring enhancement in the arterial phase followed by the progressive central enhancement on portal venous and delayed phases. However, atypical imaging presentation in the form of hypervascular mICC might also be seen, which can be attributed to distinct pathological characteristics. Ancillary imaging features such as lobular shape, capsular retraction, segmental biliary dilatation, and vascular encasement favor the diagnosis of mICC. Nevertheless, these radiological findings may also be present in certain benign conditions such as focal confluent fibrosis, sclerosing hemangioma, organizing hepatic abscess, or the pseudosolid form of hydatid disease. In addition, a few malignant lesions including primary liver lymphoma, hemangioendothelioma, solitary hypovascular liver metastases, and atypical forms of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), such as scirrhous HCC, infiltrative HCC, and poorly differentiated HCC, may also pose a diagnostic dilemma by simulating mICC in imaging studies. Diffusion-weighted imaging and the use of hepatobiliary contrast agents might be helpful for differential diagnosis in certain cases. The aim of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive overview of mICC imaging features and to describe useful tips for differential diagnosis with its potential mimickers.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCarcinoma, HepatocellularCholangiocarcinomaLiver NeoplasmsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticHumansMagnetic Resonance Imagingmagnetic resonance imagingmass-forming cholangiocarcinomamimickers

Identifiers

PMID35200560
PMCPMC8870737
OpenAlexW4210717628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.