Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35200559›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Current Advances in Immune Checkpoint Inhibition and Clinical Genomics in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: State of the Art.

Gianluigi Califano, Idir Ouzaid, Paul Laine-Caroff, Arthur Peyrottes, Claudia Collà Ruvolo, Benjamin Pradère, Vincent Elalouf, Vincent Misrai, Jean-François Hermieu, Shahrokh F Shariat and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Gianluigi CalifanoUrology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Idir OuzaidDepartment of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, 75018 Paris, France.
Paul Laine-CaroffDepartment of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, 75018 Paris, France.
Arthur PeyrottesDepartment of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, 75018 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1158-0082
Claudia Collà RuvoloUrology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8110-7341
Benjamin PradèreDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7768-8558
Vincent ElaloufDepartment of Urology, Hospital Claude Galien, 91480 Quincy-sous-Sénart, France.
Vincent MisraiDepartment of Urology, Clinique Pasteur, UMR-1048 Toulouse, France.
Jean-François HermieuDepartment of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, 75018 Paris, France.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Evanguelos XylinasDepartment of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, 75018 Paris, France.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRMedical University of Vienna · ATClinique Pasteur · FRUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and challenging-to-treat malignancy. In most patients it is a sporadic tumor entity, less commonly it falls on the spectrum of Lynch syndrome, an autosomal dominant familial tumor syndrome. Localized UTUC with high-risk features as well as the metastatic disease scenario might require systemic therapy. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy is currently the recommended management option. However, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors into the therapeutic armamentarium has led to a paradigm shift in treatment standards. Immunotherapy has been shown to be safe and effective in treating at least metastatic UTUC, although UTUC-specific high-level evidence is still lacking. Recent technological advances and noteworthy research efforts have greatly improved the general understanding of the biological landscape of UTUC. According to the main findings, UTUC represent a particular subtype of urothelial carcinoma frequently associated with activated FGFR3 signaling, a luminal-papillary phenotype and a T-cell-depleted microenvironment. This improved knowledge promises precision oncology approaches that match treatment decision strategies and genomic profile to ultimately result in better clinical outcomes. The aim of this review was to summarize the main currently available evidence on immune checkpoint inhibition and clinical genomics in UTUC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsGenomicsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPrecision MedicineTumor MicroenvironmentImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsgeneticsimmune check point inhibitionprognosisradical nephroureterectomyupper tract urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID35200559
PMCPMC8870958
OpenAlexW4210324162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.