Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35200410›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Impact of the Process Variables on the Yield of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells from Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate.

Madhan Jeyaraman, Shiva Kumar Bingi, Sathish Muthu, Naveen Jeyaraman, Rathinavelpandian Perunchezhian Packkyarathinam, Rajni Ranjan, Shilpa Sharma, Saurabh Kumar Jha, Manish Khanna, Sree Naga Sowndary Rajendran and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Madhan JeyaramanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Sri Lalithambigai Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai 600095, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9045-9493
Shiva Kumar BingiIndian Stem Cell Study Group (ISCSG) Association, Lucknow 226010, India.
Sathish MuthuDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Engineering and Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida 201310, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7143-4354
Naveen JeyaramanIndian Stem Cell Study Group (ISCSG) Association, Lucknow 226010, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4362-3326
Rathinavelpandian Perunchezhian PackkyarathinamDepartment of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Omandurar Government Estate, Chennai 600002, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4820-5278
Rajni RanjanDepartment of Orthopaedics, School of Medical Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida 201310, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2324-6970
Shilpa SharmaDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Saurabh Kumar JhaDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Engineering and Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida 201310, India.
Manish KhannaIndian Stem Cell Study Group (ISCSG) Association, Lucknow 226010, India.
Sree Naga Sowndary RajendranDepartment of Medicine, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry 605102, India.
Ramya Lakshmi RajendranDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6987-0854
Prakash GangadaranDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0658-4604
Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia National Law University · INKyungpook National University · KRSharda University · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INDr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute · INGovernment Medical College · INGovernment Medical College and Hospital · INInstitute of Medical Sciences · INSri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre · IN

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2019R1I1A1A01061296National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021R1I1A1A01040732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human bone marrow (BM) has been highlighted as a promising source of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) containing various growth factors and cytokines that can be potentially utilized in regenerative procedures involving cartilage and bone. However, the proportion of MSCs in the nucleated cell population of BM is only around 0.001% to 0.01% thereby making the harvesting and processing technique crucial for obtaining optimal results upon its use in various regenerative processes. Although several studies in the literature have given encouraging results on the utility of BM aspiration concentrate (BMAC) in various regenerative procedures, there is a lack of consensus concerning the harvesting variables such as choice of anesthetic agent to be used, site of harvest, size of the syringe to be used, anticoagulant of choice, and processing variables such as centrifugation time, and speed. In this review article, we aim to discuss the variables in the harvesting and processing technique of BMAC and their impact on the yield of MSCs in the final concentrate obtained from them.

Indexed as

bone marrowbone marrow aspirate concentratemesenchymal stromal cells

Identifiers

PMID35200410
PMCPMC8869489
OpenAlexW4210571506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.