Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35200347›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2022

Paper-Based Electrodes Conjugated with Tungsten Disulfide Nanostructure and Aptamer for Impedimetric Detection of

Annu Mishra, Roberto Pilloton, Swati Jain, Souradeep Roy, Manika Khanuja, Ashish Mathur, Jagriti Narang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multimodal Biosensing of Foodborne Pathogens.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Aptamers: precision tools for diagnosing and treating infectious diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Annu MishraAmity Institute of Nanotechnology, Amity University, Noida 201313, India.
Roberto PillotonCNR-IC, Area della Ricerca di RM1, Via Salaria km 29.3, Monterotondo, I-00015 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5329-110X
Swati JainAmity Institute of Nanotechnology, Amity University, Noida 201313, India.
Souradeep RoyCentre for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIDRI), University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun 248007, India.
Manika KhanujaCentre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India.
Ashish MathurCentre for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIDRI), University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun 248007, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5365-5807
Jagriti NarangDepartment of Biotechnology, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India.

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board SERB No. ECR/2017/001222)University Grant Commission UGC No.F.4-5(201 FRP)/2015(BSR)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we report on a novel aptasensor based on an electrochemical paper-based analytical device (ePAD) that employs a tungsten disulfide (WS

Indexed as

Aptamers, NucleotideBiosensing TechniquesListeria monocytogenesNanostructuresElectrochemical TechniquesElectrodesEscherichia coliLimit of DetectionSulfidesTungsten CompoundsAptamers, NucleotideSulfidesTungsten Compoundstungsten sulfideelectrochemical aptasensorePADListeria monocytogenespaper-based electrodepoint-of-careWS2 nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID35200347
PMCPMC8869618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.