ReviewBiosensors2022
Applications of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, RGB- and MultiSpectral Imaging for Quality Determinations of White Meat: A Review.
Review in Biosensors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Nondestructive Measurement Technologies for Meat Quality and Safety: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Simultaneous Assessment of Chicken Freshness and Authenticity Using a Single Multispectral Imaging Device: A Cross-Laboratory Evaluation Using Identical Instruments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integration of non-invasive and conventional systems for quality assessment and authentication of meat stuffs: A review with bibliometric analysis.Food chemistry: X · 2025Review
- Advancing Crop Resilience Through High-Throughput Phenotyping for Crop Improvement in the Face of Climate Change.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Deep machine learning identified fish flesh using multispectral imaging.Current research in food science · 2024Article
- Deep Learning in Precision Agriculture: Artificially Generated VNIR Images Segmentation for Early Postharvest Decay Prediction in Apples.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Molecular mechanisms underlying the impact of muscle fiber types on meat quality in livestock and poultry.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Review
- Research Progress on Nutritional Value, Preservation and Processing of Fish-A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluorescence spectroscopy, color imaging and multispectral imaging (MSI) have emerged as effective analytical methods for the non-destructive detection of quality attributes of various white meat products such as fish, shrimp, chicken, duck and goose. Based on machine learning and convolutional neural network, these techniques can not only be used to determine the freshness and category of white meat through imaging and analysis, but can also be used to detect various harmful substances in meat products to prevent stale and spoiled meat from entering the market and causing harm to consumer health and even the ecosystem. The development of quality inspection systems based on such techniques to measure and classify white meat quality parameters will help improve the productivity and economic efficiency of the meat industry, as well as the health of consumers. Herein, a comprehensive review and discussion of the literature on fluorescence spectroscopy, color imaging and MSI is presented. The principles of these three techniques, the quality analysis models selected and the research results of non-destructive determinations of white meat quality over the last decade or so are analyzed and summarized. The review is conducted in this highly practical research field in order to provide information for future research directions. The conclusions detail how these efficient and convenient imaging and analytical techniques can be used for non-destructive quality evaluation of white meat in the laboratory and in industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.