Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35200286›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Research on the Impact of Enterprise Green Development Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Approach.

Xingwei Li, Jiachi Dai, Jingru Li, Jinrong He, Xiang Liu, Yicheng Huang, Qiong Shen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanism of Enterprise Green Innovation Behavior Considering Coevolution Theory.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xingwei LiCollege of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611830, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8853-356X
Jiachi DaiCollege of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611830, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8448-7191
Jingru LiCollege of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611830, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3394-8714
Jinrong HeCollege of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611830, China.
Xiang LiuCollege of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611830, China.
Yicheng HuangCollege of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611830, China.
Qiong ShenCollege of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611830, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0465-981X
Sichuan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

Scientific Research Startup Foundation for Introducing Talents of Sichuan Agricultural University 2122996022Sichuan Students' Platform for Innovation and Entrepreneurship training program S202110626136Social Science Special Project of Sichuan Agricultural University Disciplinary Construction Dual Support Program 2021SYYB05Special Funds of the National Social Science Fund of China 18VSJ038Undergraduate Training Program for Innovation and Entrepreneurship of Sichuan Agricultural University 202110626136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The environmental situation is not optimistic. Improving the level of enterprise green development behavior can help enterprises to comply with the trend of environmental protection. However, existing studies do not explain the factors influencing enterprise green development behavior. This research collects and screens 33 empirical studies related to enterprise green development behavior from multiple authoritative data platforms, which cover 10 different countries and regions. A quantitative approach is then used to comprehensively explore the influencing factors, deeply dig into their degree of influence, and explore the moderating effect of the moderators. The results show the following: (1) corporate tangible resources, corporate intangible resources, market environment, policy and institutional environment, and public supervision have positive effects on enterprise green development behavior, and there are differences in the degree of influence; (2) corporate intangible resources have the most significant influence on enterprise green development behavior; (3) the size, region, and industry of enterprise can moderate enterprise green development behavior. This research suggests four participants: society, enterprise, market, and government. The research results are intended to provide a basis for researchers to further study enterprise green development behavior for specific industries and promote enterprise green development.

Indexed as

cleaner productiongreen development behaviorgreen supply chain management practiceindustrial ecologymeta-analysisorganizational behavior

Identifiers

PMID35200286
PMCPMC8869229
OpenAlexW4210750400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.