ReviewDentistry journal2022
Success Rates and Complications Associated with Single Immediate Implants: A Systematic Review.
Review in Dentistry journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The use of internal irrigation versus external and combined irrigation during dental implant bed preparation, a systematic review.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Evaluating the Success of Immediate Implants in the Esthetic Zone: A Narrative Review with Case Illustration.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Assessment of Radiation Attenuation Properties in Dental Implants Using Monte Carlo Method.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Platelet-rich fibrin and concentrated growth factor in the treatment of immediate implants in teeth with periapical lesions: A clinical trial with two-year follow-up.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Impact of Pontic Geometry on Load to Failure and Displacement in Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Prostheses: An In Vitro Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Assessing the Long-Term Survival of Dental Implants in A Retrospective Analysis: Immediate Versus Delayed Placement.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Article
- Influencing factors and survival rates in immediate vs. delayed dental implant placement: a six-year retrospective analysis.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Article
- Biomimetic Coatings in Implant Dentistry: A Quick Update.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Analysis for Predictors of Failure of Orthodontic Mini-implant Using Patient-Specific Finite Element Models.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Survival Rates and Factors Affecting the Outcome Following Immediate and Delayed Implant Placement: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Immediate versus Delayed Implantation for Single-Tooth Restoration of Maxillary Anterior Teeth: A Comparative Analysis on Efficacy.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined the success rates of single immediate implants and their associated biological, hardware and aesthetic complications. Using a developed search strategy, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on single-unit immediate implants with at least six human participants, a minimum follow-up time of 12 months and published between January 1999 and January 2021 were identified. Data was extracted independently using pre-designed data extraction forms. Information on success rates and associated biological, hardware and aesthetic complications were obtained and assessed. Out of 191 potentially eligible studies, 26 RCTs assessing 1270 patients with a total of 1326 single implants were included and further evaluated. In this review, success rate was reported to be 96.7-100% over a total of 9 studies. However, there was a lack of consensus on a universal success criterion between authors emphasizing the need for agreement. The average follow up was 29 months and most reported complications were aesthetic (63 cases, 4.7%), whilst there were relatively fewer biological, (20 cases, 1.5%), and hardware complications (24 cases, 1.8%). Success rate is an uncommon clinical outcome with 9 out of 26 of the selected RCTs reporting it. In these studies, single immediate implants showed a high success rate with low numbers of biological and hardware complications, and high patient satisfaction with aesthetics were reported in the short-term follow-up of one year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.