Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35200156›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Traditional Machine Learning Models and Bidirectional Encoder Representations From Transformer (BERT)-Based Automatic Classification of Tweets About Eating Disorders: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.

José Alberto Benítez-Andrades, José-Manuel Alija-Pérez, Maria-Esther Vidal, Rafael Pastor-Vargas, María Teresa García-Ordás

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The research foundation for COVID-19 vaccine development.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

José Alberto Benítez-Andrades *SALBIS Research Group, Department of Electric, Systems and Automatics Engineering, University of León, León, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4450-349X
José-Manuel Alija-PérezSECOMUCI Research Group, Escuela de Ingenierías Industrial e Informática, Universidad de León, León, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9396-5941
Maria-Esther Vidal *Leibniz University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1160-8727
Rafael Pastor-Vargas *Communications and Control Systems Department, Spanish National University for Distance Education, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4089-9538
María Teresa García-Ordás *SECOMUCI Research Group, Escuela de Ingenierías Industrial e Informática, Universidad de León, León, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3796-3949

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEating disorders affect an increasing number of people. Social networks provide information that can help.

objectiveWe aimed to find machine learning models capable of efficiently categorizing tweets about eating disorders domain.

methodsWe collected tweets related to eating disorders, for 3 consecutive months. After preprocessing, a subset of 2000 tweets was labeled: (1) messages written by people suffering from eating disorders or not, (2) messages promoting suffering from eating disorders or not, (3) informative messages or not, and (4) scientific or nonscientific messages. Traditional machine learning and deep learning models were used to classify tweets. We evaluated accuracy, F1 score, and computational time for each model.

resultsA total of 1,058,957 tweets related to eating disorders were collected. were obtained in the 4 categorizations, with The bidirectional encoder representations from transformer-based models had the best score among the machine learning and deep learning techniques applied to the 4 categorization tasks (F1 scores 71.1%-86.4%).

conclusionsBidirectional encoder representations from transformer-based models have better performance, although their computational cost is significantly higher than those of traditional techniques, in classifying eating disorder-related tweets.

Indexed as

BERTbidirectional encoder representations from transformerclassificationdatadeep learningdietdisordereating disordermachine learningmental healthmodelnatural language processingNLPnutritionperformancesocial mediaTwitterweight

Identifiers

PMID35200156
PMCPMC8914746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.