Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35200148›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2022

Novel Interactive Tool for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk Assessment (Bright Pink Assess Your Risk): Development and Usability Study.

Elizabeth A Hibler, Angela J Fought, Kiarri N Kershaw, Rebecca Molsberry, Virginia Nowakowski, Deborah Lindner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth A HiblerDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2007-8713
Angela J FoughtDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7486-8596
Kiarri N KershawDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0063-6397
Rebecca MolsberryDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9657-9963
Virginia NowakowskiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6432-1266
Deborah LindnerBright Pink, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1360-9048
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Predicting risk of cardiotoxicity among young and emerging adult breast cancer patients from treatment to survivorshipK01HL152009 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI HIBLER, ELIZABETH ANNE · 2020 to 2024
$782k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL152009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancer is significantly higher among women with genetic susceptibility or a strong family history. However, current risk assessment tools and clinical practices may identify only 10% of asymptomatic carriers of susceptibility genes. Bright Pink developed the Assess Your Risk (AYR) tool to estimate breast and ovarian cancer risk through a user-friendly, informative web-based quiz for risk assessment at the population level.

objectiveThis study aims to present the AYR tool, describe AYR users, and present evidence that AYR works as expected by comparing classification using the AYR tool with gold standard genetic testing guidelines.

methodsThe AYR is a recently developed population-level risk assessment tool that includes 26 questions based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and factors from other commonly used risk assessment tools. We included all women who completed the AYR between November 2018 and January 2019, with the exception of self-reported cancer or no knowledge of family history. We compared AYR classifications with those that were independently created using NCCN criteria using measures of validity and the McNemar test.

resultsThere were 143,657 AYR completions, and most participants were either at increased or average risk for breast cancer or ovarian cancer (137,315/143,657, 95.59%). Using our estimates of increased and average risk as the gold standard, based on the NCCN guidelines, we estimated the sensitivity and specificity for the AYR algorithm-generated risk categories as 100% and 89.9%, respectively (P<.001). The specificity improved when we considered the additional questions asked by the AYR to define increased risk, which were not examined by the NCCN criteria. By race, ethnicity, and age group; we found that the lowest observed specificity was for the Asian race (85.9%) and the 30 to 39 years age group (87.6%) for the AYR-generated categories compared with the NCCN criteria.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate that Bright Pink's AYR is an accurate tool for use by the general population to identify women at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. We plan to validate the tool longitudinally in future studies, including the impact of race, ethnicity, and age on breast and ovarian cancer risk assessment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsAdultFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansRisk Assessmentbreast cancergenetic testingovarian cancerrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID35200148
PMCPMC8914739
OpenAlexW4206717862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.