Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35199954›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2022

Detection of Newcastle disease virus and assessment of associated relative risk in backyard and commercial poultry in Kerala, India.

Chintu Ravishankar, Rajasekhar Ravindran, Anneth Alice John, Nithin Divakar, George Chandy, Vinay Joshi, Deepika Chaudhary, Nitish Bansal, Renu Singh, Niranjana Sahoo and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Chintu RavishankarDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, and Centre for Wildlife Studies, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Pookode, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5461-6420
Rajasekhar RavindranDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, and Centre for Wildlife Studies, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Pookode, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4401-5525
Anneth Alice JohnDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, and Centre for Wildlife Studies, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Pookode, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3475-6730
Nithin DivakarDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, and Centre for Wildlife Studies, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Pookode, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2444-2781
George ChandyDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, and Centre for Wildlife Studies, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Pookode, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6645-912X
Vinay JoshiDepartments of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology and Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Science, Hisar, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8872-1838
Deepika ChaudharyDepartments of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology and Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Science, Hisar, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8873-8522
Nitish BansalDepartments of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology and Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Science, Hisar, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9820-7020
Renu SinghDepartments of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology and Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Science, Hisar, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5284-6102
Niranjana SahooCollege of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7946-7986
Sunil K MorVeterinary Population Medicine Department, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-1112-088X
Nand K MahajanDepartments of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology and Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Science, Hisar, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9556-0064
Sushila MaanDepartments of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology and Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Science, Hisar, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4636-3934
Naresh JindalDepartments of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology and Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Science, Hisar, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5464-0140
Megan A SchillingDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
Catherine M HerzogThe Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-3021-888X
Saurabh BasuDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, College of Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-0333-1385
Jessica Radzio-BasuThe Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-0395-0736
Vivek KapurDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-9648-0138
Sagar M GoyalVeterinary Population Medicine Department, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-7781-3080
Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences · INKerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · INPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USOdisha University of Agriculture and Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNewcastle disease (ND) is an economically important viral disease affecting the poultry industry. In Kerala, a state in South India, incidences of ND in commercial and backyard poultry have been reported. But a systematic statewide study on the prevalence of the disease has not been carried out.

objectivesA cross-sectional survey was performed to detect the presence of Newcastle disease virus (NDV) in suspect cases and among apparently healthy commercial flocks and backyard poultry, in the state and to identify risk factors for NDV infection.

methodsReal-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was used to detect the M gene of NDV in choanal swabs and tissue samples collected from live and dead birds, respectively and the results were statistically analysed.

resultsThe predominant clinical signs of the examined birds included mild respiratory signs, huddling together and greenish diarrhoea. Nervous signs in the form of torticollis were noticed in birds in some of the affected flocks. On necropsy, many birds had haemorrhages in the proventriculus and caecal tonsils which were suggestive of ND. Of the 2079 samples tested, 167 (8.0%) were positive for the NDV M-gene by RT-PCR. Among 893 samples collected from diseased flocks, 129 (14.5%), were positive for M gene with pairwise relative risk (RR) of 15.6 as compared to apparently healthy flocks where 6 out of 650 (0.9%) samples were positive. All positive samples were from poultry; none of the ducks, pigeons, turkey and wild birds were positive. Commercial broilers were at higher risk of infection than commercial layers (RR: 4.5) and backyard poultry (RR: 4.9). Similarly, birds reared under intensive housing conditions were at a higher risk of being infected as compared to those reared under semi-intensive (RR: 6.7) or backyard housing (RR: 2.1). Multivariable analysis indicated that significantly higher risk of infection exists during migratory season and during ND outbreaks occurring nearby. Further, lower risk was observed with flock vaccination and backyard or semi-intensive housing when compared to intensive housing. When the M gene positive samples were tested by RT-PCR to determine whether the detected NDV were mesogenic/velogenic, 7 (4.2%) were positive.

conclusionsIn Kerala, NDV is endemic in poultry with birds reared commercially under intensive rearing systems being affected the most. The outcome of this study also provides a link between epidemiologic knowledge and the development of successful disease control measures. Statistical analysis suggests that wild bird migration season and presence of migratory birds influences the prevalence of the virus in the State. Further studies are needed to genotype and sub-genotype the detected viruses and to generate baseline data on the prevalence of NDV strains, design better detection strategies, and determine patterns of NDV transmission across domestic poultry and wild bird populations in Kerala.

Indexed as

Newcastle DiseasePoultry DiseasesAnimalsAnimals, WildChickensCross-Sectional StudiesHousingNewcastle disease virusPoultryRiskF geneM geneNewcastle diseasepoultryprevalencerelative riskRT-PCR

Identifiers

PMID35199954
PMCPMC9122440
OpenAlexW4213444150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.