ArticleJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2021
Inducible Clindamycin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus among Patients Attending Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.
Article in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nasal Carriage of Methicillin-ResistantInterdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStaphylococcus aureus, a superbug, resistant to multiple antibiotics led to growing interest in the usage of macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B antibiotics, which are now rapidly developing resistance. This study aims to find the prevalence of inducible clindamycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among obtained clinical samples from in-patient and out-patient departments of a tertiary care center.
methodsThis is a descriptive cross-sectional study done in clinical samples from the in-patient and out-patient departments of a tertiary care center from September 2020-May 2021. Ethical clearance was taken from the Institutional Review Committee (Ref: 068/2077/2078). Staphylococcus aureus were isolated and antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed by disc diffusion method. Inducible clindamycin and methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus were detected using D-test and cefoxitin disc according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Convenient sampling was done and the data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20. Point estimate at 95% confidence interval was calculated along with frequency and proportion for binary data.
resultsAmong a total of 141 Staphylococcus aureus isolated, the prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistant phenotype was 41 (29.1%) (21.6-36.59 at 95% Confidence Interval). Whereas, 30 (21.3%) were constitutive clindamycin resistant. The inducible 28 (47.5%) and 19 (32.2%) constitutive clindamycin resistance was higher among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
conclusionsThe frequency of inducible clindamycin resistance among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus was high, which alarms the use of macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B antibiotics in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Hence, D-test should be performed to detect inducible clindamycin resistance in routine testing to prevent treatment failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.