Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35199483›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of rheumatic diseases2022

Efficacy and safety of S-flurbiprofen plaster in knee osteoarthritis patients: A 2-week randomized controlled Phase III clinical trial compared to diclofenac gel.

Kenji Tomatsu, Shoji Yasuda, Ahmad Fuady, Hideo Matsumoto, Sumariyono

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of rheumatic diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kenji TomatsuInternational Business Headquarter, Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2856-7514
Shoji YasudaInternational Business Headquarter, Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Ahmad FuadyDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0030-0524
Hideo MatsumotoPublic Interest Incorporated Foundation, Japan Sports Medicine Foundation, Tokyo, Japan.
SumariyonoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Taisho Pharmaceutical (Japan) · JPUniversity of Indonesia · IDPublic interest incorporated foundation Keep Association · JP

Funding

Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimS-flurbiprofen plaster (SFPP) is a novel topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) patch. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of SFPP in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients compared to diclofenac gel.

methodsThis study was a multicenter, randomized, active-controlled, open-label, non-inferiority phase III trial. There were 311 enrolled patients treated by SFPP or diclofenac gel for 2 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was the knee pain when rising from the specially arranged chair assessed by visual analog scale (rVAS). The other efficacy outcomes were clinical symptoms, pain on walking, global assessment by both investigator and patient, and use/non-use of the rescue drugs during the treatment period. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated as the safety outcome.

resultsThe least-squares mean (95% CI) of ΔrVAS at the end of the study was 41.52 (39.16-43.88) mm in the SFPP group and 36.01 (33.69-38.33) mm in the diclofenac gel group, with a between-group difference of 5.51 (2.20-8.82), indicating non-inferiority. There were statistically significant differences between the groups in rVAS, clinical symptoms, pain on walking, and the global assessment by both investigator and patient. The incidence rate of AEs in the SFPP group was 5.8%, and there was no statistically significant difference from that in the diclofenac gel group (5.2%). Most of the AEs were mild, and no AE led to discontinuation.

conclusionNon-inferiority of SFPP to diclofenac gel was demonstrated in the efficacy for pain on rising from a chair. SFPP was also well-tolerated in knee OA patients.

Indexed as

FlurbiprofenOsteoarthritis, KneeAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiclofenacDouble-Blind MethodHumansPainTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiclofenacFlurbiprofennonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugosteoarthritispainpatchrandomized controlled studyS-flurbiprofenvisual analog scale

Identifiers

PMID35199483
PMCPMC9303700
OpenAlexW4213430432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.