Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35199314›Full record

SynthesisJournal of nephrology2022

Immunosuppression therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: systematic review with network meta-analysis.

Bhadran Bose, Edmund Y M Chung, Regina Hong, Giovanni F M Strippoli, David W Johnson, Wen-Ling Yang, Sunil V Badve, Suetonia C Palmer

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. EditorialAssignment.BMJ open · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Bhadran BoseAustralasian Kidney Trials Network, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia. bhadran.bose@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0003-1539-1502
Edmund Y M ChungCentre for Kidney Research, Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Regina HongDepartment of Nephrology, St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Giovanni F M StrippoliCentre for Kidney Research, Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
David W JohnsonAustralasian Kidney Trials Network, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Wen-Ling YangDepartment of Nephrology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Sunil V BadveAustralasian Kidney Trials Network, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Suetonia C PalmerDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.
The University of Queensland · AUChildren's Hospital at Westmead · AUPeking University · CNSt George Hospital · AUThe University of Sydney · AUTranslational Research Institute · AUUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdiopathic membranous nephropathy is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines recommend rituximab or cyclophosphamide and steroids, or calcineurin inhibitor-based therapy. However, there have been few or no head-to-head comparisons of the relative efficacy and safety of different immunosuppression regimens. We conducted a network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of available immunosuppression strategies compared to cyclophosphamide in adults with idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

methodsWe performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials in the treatment of adults with idiopathic membranous nephropathy. The primary outcome was complete remission. Secondary outcomes were kidney failure, partial remission, estimated glomerular filtration rate, doubling of serum creatinine, proteinuria, serious adverse events, discontinuation of treatment, serious infection and bone marrow suppression.

resultsCyclophosphamide had uncertain effects on inducing complete remission when compared to rituximab (OR 0.35, CI 0.10-1.24, low certainty evidence), mycophenolate mofetil (OR 1.81, CI 0.69-4.71, low certainty), calcineurin inhibitor (OR 1.26, CI 0.61-2.63, low certainty) or steroid monotherapy (OR 2.31, CI 0.62-8.52, low certainty). Cyclophosphamide had a higher probability of inducing complete remission when compared to calcineurin inhibitor plus rituximab (OR 4.45, CI 1.04-19.10, low certainty). Compared to other immunosuppression strategies, there was limited evidence that cyclophosphamide had different effects on other pre-specified outcomes.

conclusionsThe comparative effectiveness and safety of immunosuppression strategies compared to cyclophosphamide is uncertain in adults with idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Indexed as

Glomerulonephritis, MembranousAdultCalcineurin InhibitorsCyclophosphamideFemaleHumansImmunosuppression TherapyImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleRituximabSteroidsCalcineurin InhibitorsCyclophosphamideImmunosuppressive AgentsRituximabSteroidsCalcineurin inhibitorCytotoxic agentsMembranous nephropathyNetwork meta-analysisRituximab

Identifiers

PMID35199314
PMCPMC9107446
OpenAlexW4213433010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.