ReviewCurrent oncology reports2022
Clinicopathological Review of Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinoma.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in micropapillary urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis from the Korean Bladder Cancer Research Group.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Histological Subtypes and Divergent Differentiation of Urothelial Carcinoma: Histology, Genomics, and Management Implications.European urology · 2026Review
- Review
- Frequency and Characterization of Rare Histologic Subtypes in Canine Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Endometrioid Carcinoma of the Uterine Corpus With a Micropapillary Component: A Novel Prognostic Factor For Metastasis.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review will discuss micropapillary urothelial carcinoma with respect to biology, histopathologic characteristics, genetic and molecular features, diagnosis, clinical management, and future directions of research. RECENT
findingsRecent consensus opinion study showed only moderate interobserver reproducibility in the diagnostic criteria. The most reproducible criteria with the highest consensus were multiple nests in the same lacunar spaces. There are recent reports of high rates of intratumoral heterogeneity of ERBB2 amplification within tumor containing both micropapillary and classic urothelial components. Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma is a well-documented highly aggressive variant of urothelial carcinoma with proven worse outcomes. Accurate recognition and reporting of this pattern is critical for optimal management. Newer therapeutic strategies related to the molecular and genetic findings seen in MPUC remain to be explored further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35199295What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.