Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35199221›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2022

Benchmarking ensemble docking methods in D3R Grand Challenge 4.

Jessie Low Gan, Dhruv Kumar, Cynthia Chen, Bryn C Taylor, Benjamin R Jagger, Rommie E Amaro, Christopher T Lee

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessie Low GanSan Diego Jewish Academy, San Diego, 92130, CA, USA.
Dhruv KumarRancho Bernardo High School, San Diego, CA, 92128, USA.
Cynthia ChenCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA.
Bryn C TaylorDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Benjamin R JaggerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Rommie E AmaroDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. ramaro@ucsd.edu.
Christopher T LeeDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. ctlee@ucsd.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0670-2308
California Institute of Technology · USUniversity of California San Diego · USJanssen (Belgium) · BERancho BioSciences (United States) · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

National Biomedical Computation Resource - Competitive Revision SupplementP41GM103426 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI AMARO, ROMMIE E · 2012 to 2019
$14.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103426NIGMS NIH HHS P41-GM103426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of new drugs is a time consuming and expensive process. Methods such as virtual screening, which can filter out ineffective compounds from drug libraries prior to expensive experimental study, have become popular research topics. As the computational drug discovery community has grown, in order to benchmark the various advances in methodology, organizations such as the Drug Design Data Resource have begun hosting blinded grand challenges seeking to identify the best methods for ligand pose-prediction, ligand affinity ranking, and free energy calculations. Such open challenges offer a unique opportunity for researchers to partner with junior students (e.g., high school and undergraduate) to validate basic yet fundamental hypotheses considered to be uninteresting to domain experts. Here, we, a group of high school-aged students and their mentors, present the results of our participation in Grand Challenge 4 where we predicted ligand affinity rankings for the Cathepsin S protease, an important protein target for autoimmune diseases. To investigate the effect of incorporating receptor dynamics on ligand affinity rankings, we employed the Relaxed Complex Scheme, a molecular docking method paired with molecular dynamics-generated receptor conformations. We found that Cathepsin S is a difficult target for molecular docking and we explore some advanced methods such as distance-restrained docking to try to improve the correlation with experiments. This project has exemplified the capabilities of high school students when supported with a rigorous curriculum, and demonstrates the value of community-driven competitions for beginners in computational drug discovery.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingDrug DesignBinding SitesChildHumansLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingProtein ConformationThermodynamicsLigandsComputational biophysicsDrug discoveryEnsemble dockingMolecular dynamicsRestrained docking

Identifiers

PMID35199221
PMCPMC8907095
OpenAlexW4213436311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.