ArticleNeuroradiology2022
Use of deep learning in the MRI diagnosis of Chiari malformation type I.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep Feature-Based Detection of Chiari Malformation Type I from Sagittal T2-Weighted MRI Using a Hybrid CNN-Machine Learning Framework.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Association of Posterior Fossa Morphometric Analyses with Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow Parameters in Patients with Chiari Malformation Type 1.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2026Article
- Applications of Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Patients with Chiari Malformation Type I: A Scoping Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Fractals in Neuroimaging.Advances in neurobiology · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence Methods.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Is foramen magnum decompression for acquired Chiari I malformation like putting a finger in the dyke? - A simplistic overview of artificial intelligence in assessing critical upstream and downstream etiologies.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo train deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) models for classification of clinically significant Chiari malformation type I (CM1) on MRI to assist clinicians in diagnosis and decision making.
methodsA retrospective MRI dataset of patients diagnosed with CM1 and healthy individuals with normal brain MRIs from the period January 2010 to May 2020 was used to train ResNet50 and VGG19 CNN models to automatically classify images as CM1 or normal. A total of 101 patients diagnosed with CM1 requiring surgery and 111 patients with normal brain MRIs were included (median age 30 with an interquartile range of 23-43; 81 women with CM1). Isotropic volume transformation, image cropping, skull stripping, and data augmentation were employed to optimize model accuracy. K-fold cross validation was used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for model evaluation.
resultsThe VGG19 model with data augmentation achieved a sensitivity of 97.1% and a specificity of 97.4% with an AUC of 0.99. The ResNet50 model achieved a sensitivity of 94.0% and a specificity of 94.4% with an AUC of 0.98.
conclusionsVGG19 and ResNet50 CNN models can be trained to automatically detect clinically significant CM1 on MRI with a high sensitivity and specificity. These models have the potential to be developed into clinical support tools in diagnosing CM1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.