Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35199161›Full record

SynthesisHuman reproduction update2022

Anti-Müllerian hormone as a marker of ovarian reserve and premature ovarian insufficiency in children and women with cancer: a systematic review.

Richard A Anderson, David Cameron, Florian Clatot, Isabelle Demeestere, Matteo Lambertini, Scott M Nelson, Fedro Peccatori

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human reproduction update, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Anti-Müllerian hormone and somatic ovarian function: a new perspective.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Richard A AndersonMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7495-518X
David CameronEdinburgh University Cancer Centre, IGMM, Edinburgh, UK.
Florian ClatotCentre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.
Isabelle DemeestereFertility clinic, CUB-Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Matteo LambertiniDepartment of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Scott M NelsonSchool of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9099-3047
Fedro PeccatoriEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Centre Henri BecquerelEdinburgh Cancer Research · GBEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITMRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBNIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre · GBOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

Medical Research Council G1100357Medical Research Council MR/N022556/1Medical Research Council MR/W019140/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFemale patients undergoing anticancer treatment are at elevated risk of adverse ovarian outcomes including infertility and premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), which is associated with short- and long-term health risks. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is a key biomarker of ovarian reserve, but its role prior to and after cancer treatment is less well understood. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: To conduct a systematic review evaluating AMH as a biomarker of ovarian reserve and POI before and after anticancer treatment, which has become a pressing clinical issue in reproductive medicine. There are a large number of observational studies, but differences in patient groups, cancer diagnoses and study design make this a confusing field that will benefit from a thorough and robust review. SEARCH

methodsA systematic literature search for AMH in women with cancer was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to 1 April 2021. Bias review was conducted using the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) protocol along with qualitative assessment of quality. Exploratory subgroups were established based on age, cancer type and length of follow-up. OUTCOMES: Ninety-two publications (N = 9183 patients) were included in this analysis after quality and bias review. Reduced/undetectable AMH was consistently identified in 69/75 studies (92%) following chemotherapy or radiotherapy, with reductions ranging from 42% to concentrations below the limit of detection, and many reporting mean or median declines of ≥90%. Where longitudinal data were analysed (42 studies), a majority (33/42 (79%)) of studies reported at least partial recovery of AMH at follow-up, however, effect estimates were highly variable, reflecting that AMH levels were strongly impacted by anticancer treatment (i.e. the chemotherapy regimen used and the number of treatment cycles need), with recovery and its degree determined by treatment regimen, age and pre-treatment AMH level. In 16/31 (52%) publications, oligo/amenorrhoea was associated with lower post-treatment AMH consistent with impending POI, although menstruation and/or pregnancy were reported in patients with low or undetectable AMH. Long-term (>5 years) follow-up of paediatric patients following cancer treatment also found significantly lower AMH compared with control groups in 14/20 (70%) of studies, with very variable effect sizes from complete loss of AMH to full recovery depending on treatment exposure, as in adult patients. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: AMH can be used to identify the damaging effect of cancer treatments on ovarian function. This can be applied to individual women, including pre-pubertal and adolescent girls, as well as comparing different treatment regimens, ages and pre-treatment AMH levels in populations of women. While there was evidence for its value in the diagnosis of POI after cancer treatment, further studies across a range of diagnoses/treatment regimens and patient ages are required to clarify this, and to quantify its predictive value. A major limitation for the use of AMH clinically is the very limited data relating post-treatment AMH levels to fertility, duration of reproductive lifespan or time to POI; analysis of these clinically relevant outcomes will be important in further research.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsOvarian ReservePrimary Ovarian InsufficiencyAdolescentAdultAnti-Mullerian HormoneBiomarkersChildFemaleHumansObservational Studies as TopicPregnancyAnti-Mullerian HormoneBiomarkersAMHanti-Müllerian hormonecancerchemotherapyfertilitygonadotoxicityovarian insufficiencyovarian reserve

Identifiers

PMID35199161
PMCPMC9071067
OpenAlexW4210569926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.