Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35199088›Full record

ArticleJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health2022

Epidermal Basement Membrane Substitutes for Bioengineering of Human Epidermal Equivalents.

Nikola Kolundzic, Preeti Khurana, Debra Crumrine, Anna Celli, Theodora M Mauro, Dusko Ilic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nikola KolundzicDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Preeti KhuranaDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Debra CrumrineUCSF Department of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Anna CelliUCSF Department of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Theodora M MauroUCSF Department of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Dusko IlicDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBSan Francisco VA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidermal basement membrane, a tightly packed network of extracellular matrix (ECM) components, is a source of physical, chemical, and biological factors required for the structural and functional homeostasis of the epidermis. Variations within the ECM create distinct environments, which can affect the property of cells in the basal layer of the epidermis and subsequently affect keratinocyte differentiation and stratification. Very little attention has been paid to mimicking basement membrane in organotypic cultures. In this study, using parameters outlined in a consensus on the quality standard of organotypic models suitable for dermatological research, we have evaluated three basement membrane substitutes. We compared fibronectin with three complex three-dimensional matrices: Matrigel, decellularized dermal fibroblast‒produced and ‒assembled ECM, and a dry human amniotic membrane. Our results suggest that Matrigel is not a suitable substrate for human epidermal equivalent culture, whereas the two other complex three-dimensional substitutes, decellularized dermal fibroblast‒produced and ‒assembled ECM and dry human amniotic membrane, were superior to single layer fibronectin coating. Human epidermal equivalents cultured on either decellularized dermal fibroblast‒produced and ‒assembled ECM or on dry human amniotic membrane generated hemidesmosomes, whereas those on fibronectin did not. In addition, human epidermal equivalent cultured on decellularized dermal fibroblast‒produced and ‒assembled ECM and on dry human amniotic membrane can be maintained in culture 4 days longer than human epidermal equivalent cultured on fibronectin without compromising the barrier function.

Indexed as

3D, three-dimensionalCa++, calcium iondDF ECM, decellularized dermal fibroblast‒produced and ‒assembled extracellular matrixdHAM, dry human amniotic membraneECM, extracellular matrixHEE, human epidermal equivalentHSE, human skin equivalentKC, keratinocyteK, keratinTEER, transepithelial electrical resistance

Identifiers

PMID35199088
PMCPMC8844655
OpenAlexW4200277313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.